MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1516497077

Evaporation control using covers - some realistic solutions for the irrigation industry

2006· article· en· W1516497077 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian Craig, Erik Schmidt, Michael Scobie

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiquePlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEvaporationEnvironmental scienceIrrigationHydrology (agriculture)Pan evaporationAgricultureEnvironmental engineeringAgricultural engineeringMeteorologyEngineeringGeographyGeotechnical engineeringEcology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

[Abstract]: In Australia, up to 40% of the water stored in small farm dams over the summer months may be lost to evaporation. Reducing this loss using either physical or chemical covers therefore has the potential to significantly increase agricultural water use efficiency in Australia and therefore generate millions of dollars for the Australian economy.\n\nA research project took place from 2003-2005 to investigate the performance of various different types of cover. Outcomes from the Queensland Natural Resources and Mines commissioned project included important new knowledge regarding the field performance of various different types of cover, technology to accurately assess evaporation and seepage losses and increased public awareness of the potential for evaporation reduction on water storages. Significant interest has been shown by landholders, agencies and consultancy companies in developing this further. \n\nThe project involved the development of a novel experimental method to measure and record water depth to an accuracy of ±1mm using highly accurate Pressure Sensitive Transducers (Craig et al 2005). PST units were placed at a constant 30cm height above the dam floor by a float-weight mechanism. The units were connected to dataloggers and the data was compared to weather station derived Penman-Monteith based estimates of evaporation. This enabled evaporation losses to be separated from seepage, also a very significant loss of Australian farm water.\n\nThe PST methodology confirmed that evaporation losses in small farm dams was typically 4-7mm/day in summer rising to 10mm/day when air temperatures exceeded 40° C. As a matter of interest, the analysis also revealed that Australian summer night-time evaporation due to heat advection effects could be as much as 10-20% of the total daily evaporation. \n\nThe PST analysis technique applied to covered dams revealed evaporation reduction performance figures of approximately 75% for shadecloth covered dams, up to 95% with dams covered with a properly functioning floating cover, and approximately 15 to 30% with dams covered with a cetyl alcohol based chemical monolayer (Barnes, 1993). Optimising the performance of monolayers with improved application technology is currently the focus of evaporation research efforts at NCEA.\n\nThe study has revealed that high evaporation savings are possible if physical covers are used on small farm dams less than 10ha in size. Physical covers can still be used on dams larger than 10ha in size, but may be prove economically impractical due to the high amounts of capital investment required. In the future, however, increasing cost of water may allow increasingly large sizes of dam to be covered. For the present, economic analyses have implied that chemical covers may represent the best option for evaporation control on large farm water storages. \n\nFuture research is planned commencing in June 2006 with the support of the CRC for Irrigation Futures and collaboration with CRC for Polymers and Nylex Water Solutions, producers of WaterSavr, the cetyl alcohol based chemical monolayer. A new applicator for applying the monolayer has recently been developed which relies on a compressed air system for delivery of the powder just below the water surface. The instrument was successfully demonstrated for the first time in Australia at USQ Toowoomba in the presence of David Verlee (Vice President of Business Development, Water Savr Global Solutions Inc, Richmond, Canada and Greg Phillips, Northern Regional Manager, Nylex Corporation. The applicator has been trialed at Byrock (80km south of Bourke, NSW) by Brendon Mason, Nylex Water Solutions.\n\nThe research will focus upon developing computer assisted application technology which will relies upon visualisation of the chemical coverage on the water surface. Fundamental research will be carried out on the performance of chemical monolayers in terms of their spread and resistance to breakup, microbial and UV degradation. Preliminary investigations have indicated that the performance of cetyl alcohol based monolayers may be significantly enhanced with the addition of other chemicals, for example, poly vinyl stearate. PVS is a polymer with a comb-like structure which may enhance the resistance of the monolayer to wind stress (Barnes, 1993).\n\nThe NCEA evaporation research team comprises Director Erik Schmidt, Ian Craig, Andrew Green and Michael Scobie. The project was funded by the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines (NRM) through the Rural Water Use Efficiency Initiative (RWUEI). The project depended upon the cooperation of product suppliers including NetPro (shadecloth), Nylex Water Solutions (WaterSavr), Evaporation Control Systems (E-VapCap), Raftex, Ciba Speciality Chemicals, and site owners Moonrocks (St George), Cubbie Station (Dirranbandi), Renato Andreatta (Stanthorpe) and Peak Downs Shire Council (Capella).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,273
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,969

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,177
Écart entre enseignants0,164 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)Même sujetPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsTravaux en français237 207