MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1516874492

Mexico's insecurity in North America

2007· article· en· W1516874492 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHomeland security affairs · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueInternational Relations in Latin America
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNational securityDemocratizationAuthoritarianismDemocracyPolitical economyPolitical sciencePresidential systemPoliticsPublic administrationGrassrootsFailed stateDevelopment economicsSociologyLawEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Instituto Tecnologico de MonterreyOctober 18, 2007INTRODUCTIONThis paper will argue first that Mexico's incapacity to develop a coherent national and regional security framework has paralleled Mexico's inability to undergo a reformation of Mexican State, and with it, of national security reform. Second, rather than true change, authoritarian legacies have been more robust and abundant in Mexico since arrival of right wing, National Action Party (PAN), in year 2000. Third, controversial result of 2006 presidential election in Mexico has exacerbated polarization between right and left to construct consensus and platforms for local and national security regarding terrorism, natural disasters, and drug trafficking due to lack of legitimacy in government. 1 These circumstances encapsulate current Mexican framework and highlight exacerbation of threats and vulnerabilities Mexico faces in order to address changing regional and international security environment and prospect of creating a new security perimeter in North America.BEYOND A DEMOCRATIC TRANSITIONIn 1990s several academics argued that a Mexican transition to democracy was only way to develop a coherent national security doctrine for country because corrupt nature of Mexican political system created sources of instability and distrust in Mexico and abroad after decades of a single party in For example, in 1996 Guadalupe Gonzalez stated that democracy could give country enduring stability and internal peace. Genuine democratization requires not just clean and fair elections but also effective administration of justice and decentralization of power. 2 Today, Mexico's transition to democracy is in question after 2006 presidential election. Despite political opening in 2000, Fox administration did not manage to develop a coherent national security doctrine, structure, organization. or a solid legal framework. Unfortunately, government of Felipe Calderon has not delineated bases of a global and integral plan of state reform on national security especially in terms of Mexico's deepening integration with its North American neighbors of Canada and United States. Within its current political, institutional, and conceptual vacuum, Mexico is much more vulnerable and unsafe than a decade ago and unable to effectively defend its national interests. Were assumptions of 1990s wrong? Or is lack of a national security doctrine in Mexico today outcome of intense and deep divisions among political elites? What are consequences for North American regional security initiatives?EXPLORING SOME EXPLANATIONSIn 2000, Mexican transition to democracy equipped Vicente Fox with unprecedented legitimacy, not only for government, but for viability of Mexican State. The democratic bond given to government through ballot boxes was a historical opportunity to (1) redirect relationship with United States and (2) carry out reform of state and national security apparatus.Some of first successes of Mexican foreign policy were suspension of decertification policy by U.S. Congress, recognition of a North American Community, initial negotiations of migratory reform, and public acceptance by Bush administration that Mexico was the most important nation for U.S. foreign policy. 3 For President Fox and his then minister of foreign relations, Jorge G. Castaneda, their proactive initiatives represented an important departure from defensive nature of Mexican foreign policy in their first months of Within government ? Commission of Order and Respect led by Adolfo Aguilar Zinser ? national security advisor had responsibility to coordinate a long-term perspective on national security, national sovereignty, preservation of rule of law, governability, public security, administration of justice, and honest government in coordination with cabinet members including: 4[Figure omitted. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,736
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,941

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle