Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: A Sociology of Spirituality Philip Sheldrake (bio) A Sociology of Spirituality. Edited by Kieran Flanagan and Peter C. Jupp. Aldershot/Burlington VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2007. 286 pp. $99.95 (hardback), $34.95 (paper). This collection of essays on spirituality from the perspective of the sociology of religion is at times fascinating and illuminating but in other ways somewhat frustrating. The book is part of a series published by Ashgate and sponsored by the British Sociological Association Sociology of Religion Study Group. What is particularly fascinating, and gratifying, is that this is the first substantial collection of scholarly work to explore the meaning and significance of "spirituality" in relation to the method and preoccupations of sociology. There are twelve essays plus a substantial Introduction by Kieran Flanagan and a briefer but interesting Conclusion by both editors. This represents a modest selection from thirty-four papers given at a 2004 international conference at the University of Bristol. Despite the British origins of the overall collection, the writers represent not only British but also Dutch, Italian, American and Canadian perspectives. Until relatively recently, sociologists have usually been suspicious of notions of "the spiritual" because of its theological resonances and their concern to protect a non-ideological observation of concrete circumstances from dogmatic frameworks. Equally, some Christian scholars have been suspicious of sociologists (though less so of social scientific tools) because of a perception that they are beset with relativistic [End Page 318] thinking and a tendency to reduce everything to cultural constructs. Therefore, from the point of view of the wider field of spirituality studies, the entry of sociologists into the debate is to be warmly welcomed as it serves to expand in important ways what is already a multidisciplinary discourse. Both sides will surely gain from mutual engagement rather than unhelpful polarisations. Interestingly, both the editors Kieran Flanagan and Peter Jupp are significant figures in the British world of sociology but also interested in Christian theology. The result is a modest degree of explicit engagement with the themes and preoccupations of theology and religion more broadly not merely in the Introduction but also in a number of other essays. Giuseppe Giordan examines the shift from theological preoccupations with spirituality in contemporary Italy. Ivan Varga analyzes Georg Simmel's writings on religion. Simmel, one of the founding figures of modern sociology, is better known for his writings on sociological theory yet took religion seriously and wrote substantial and important works on it that deserve to be much better known. Mathew Guest's essay is an exploration of the ways the Christian tradition has evolved to meet a growing desire for the cultivation of the subjective self. His case study focuses on the notion of "spiritual capital" (based on Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and religious capital) in the context of Anglican clergy families. Kieran Flanagan's closing essay explores "the visual" in relation to spiritual experience and iconography particularly in Orthodox and Roman Catholic contexts. Paul Chambers' on the politics of spirituality analyses the explicitly spiritual symbolism for some Muslim women of modest dress and veiling. Flanagan's wide-ranging and sometimes idiosyncratic Introduction explores why sociological interest in spirituality has been absent until recently. He hints that, in terms of sociology's priorities, it may now prove to be a conceptual key for opening new cultural doors. For Flanagan, "spirit" and "the spiritual" are not merely supernatural but constitute an indispensable dimension of what it is to be human. Spirituality, therefore, focuses on a recognition and pursuit of matters of ultimate concern. In Western cultures, it embraces a search for meaning that is independent of institutional authority. Flanagan raises interesting and important questions about the contemporary fascination with spirituality, particularly in its holistic forms. Is it in effect a substitute religion? Is it a passing response to concrete cultural circumstances? Is it more than simply a form of therapy or leisure activity? Is it primarily individualistic and therefore encourages the loosening of social bonds? Interestingly, while acknowledging that the discipline of sociology is the product of modernity, Flanagan is deeply critical of what he perceives as modernity's de-spiritualization of culture. Three of the essays in the book...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».