Rory McDonald (images editor), and Kathleen Irwin (text editor) <i>Sightin/Citing/Siting: Crossfiring/Mama Wetotan: Theorizing Practice</i>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
RORY MCDONALD (images editor), and KATHLEEN IRWIN (text editor) Sighting/Citing/Siting: Crossfiring/Mama Wetotan; Practice Regina; University of Regina/CPRC Press, 2009. 207 pp Sighting/Citing/Siting serves as an archival document of a one-day interdisciplinary site-specific event, entitled Crossfiring/Mama Wetotan that took place at the Claybank Brick Plant National Historical Site in southwest Saskatchewan on 2 September 2006. The publication examines and theorizes the results of bringing together over fifty interdisciplinary artists from across Canada, who created work ranging from sound installations, multi-media, earthworks, and performances. The event and subsequent publication aims bridge aboriginal and non-aboriginal communities both of whom were and continue be spiritually and geologically connected the site and its surrounding landscape. How do we provoke a desire remember something when there is no personal connection it? (96). In the producing of Crossfiring/Mama Wetotan the collaborating artists visited the site and used reflective experience of the architecture of the Claybank Brick Factory and the surrounding topography known as Dirt Hills as inspiration for creating an original work. The aim of the original creation was harness the spectators' perceptual filter in recognizing their physical and connections a location few could have accessed during its productive years as the brick plant. The Claybank Brick Factory opened in 1914 manufacturing face brick for such historical sites as the Chateau Frontenac Hotel in Quebec City and the Bessborough Hotel in Saskatoon; the labour was documented as brutally manual. After World War II the need for brick manufacturing declined considerably, eventually resulting in the closure of the plant in 1989 due global economic pressures. In 1994 the site was designated a Provincial Heritage Property and a National Historic Site. To this day the site displays its authenticity: most buildings are intact and the machinery is restored and functional. The surrounding landscape of the Dirt Hills, which more strongly evidences aboriginal history, provided another resource of inspiration and cultural cross-purposes. The participating artists explored themes including cultural exploitation, land expropriation and the displacement of aboriginal cultures (6). These themes further highlighted the site's aboriginal historical footprint juxtaposed against the factories' economic gains and losses. The only restrictions placed on the artists were to leave no lasting trace on the site, further illuminating the ephemeral quality of such a project. The publication is divided into two components--Practising Theory and Theorizing Practice. The practicing theory documentation includes an exquisite photo log with adjoining artists' statements for each installation, an illustrative map of the site and its adjoining landscape, and an archival copy of the performance text. An enclosed DVD provides the reader with some visual insight into the look and feel of the daylong performance; it also includes interviews with a few of the collaborators and a slide show highlighting the sites influences on the project as a whole. The theorizing practice component is made up of fourteen essays, divided into five sections and written by the various artists, producers, spectators, academics, historians, and members of the aboriginal and non-aboriginal communities who were either directly involved in the creation or research and curatorial elements. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,028 | 0,018 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».