Poster Introductions III--The Lifecourse of Esophageal Cancer Patients Traced by Means of the Lifegrid
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The absence of prospective longitudinal studies for certain health outcomes creates the need to collect accurate information retrospectively. In an attempt to minimize recall bias and to better understand the deeper rooted issues involved in the risk factors for esophageal cancer, the adoption of the lifegrid accompanied by supplementary tools was implemented. The objective was to provide a more comprehensive and context-sensitive perspective to the study of the living and working environments of esophageal cancer patients across the lifecourse.\nMethods: A sample of 46 esophageal cancer patients were recruited from participating London and Toronto hospitals. This study involved the completion of face-to-face interviews guided by a semistructured questionnaire, a lifegrid, occupational and residential summary boxes, residential pictures and occupational risk maps, and reference to other supplementary information and sources of evidence.\nFindings: The utilization of the life grid allowed for a holistic interpretation of the data allowing for a visual analysis of various factors at play across the lifecourse. The use of the lifegrid retained the temporal ordering of the lifecourse, made it easy to identify and probe for transitions and trajectories, and allowed for various links across factors to be made during data collection. Nevertheless, its use also produced a number of challenges such as lengthy interviews, event-centered data, and the inability to pinpoint specific unknown exposures. However, these limitations could be overcome by conducting multiple, short interviews, making modifications after pilot interviews, incorporating supplementary tools, and referencing sources of evidence.\nConclusions: The lifegrid aids in stimulating recall in a factual fashion. The versatility of the lifegrid allows it to be easily modified based on different population groups and research objectives. With the integration of other supplementary tools, the adoption of the lifegrid is recommended as a methodological tool to guide other research pertaining to lifecourse studies.\nAnn Novogradec is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Faculty of Environmental Studies at York University. Her dissertation research, part of which is being presented in this poster, investigated the changing living and working environments that esophageal cancer patients experienced and were exposed to across their lifecourse. It utilized the lifegrid to aid in this objective. Her research interests include: esophageal cancer; cancer and the environment; environment and health; ecosystem health; occupational health and disease; social, cultural, economic, and political interface; cancer prevention strategies; life review; mixed methods; holistic research frameworks and strategies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».