MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1518382216 · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02057.x

Respirology: Thoughts of an incoming editor

2011· article· en· W1518382216 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter R. Eastwood

Notice bibliographique

RevueRespirology · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDelphi Technique in Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineEditorial boardLibrary scienceFamily medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I am honoured to be taking on the role of Editor in Chief of Respirology, the official journal of the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology, from Professor Y.C. Gary Lee. Gary has done a tremendous job over the past 2 years, growing the stature of Respirology to be a journal of international importance within our field. There is ample evidence that the international status of Respirology is on an upward trajectory. The number of manuscript submissions has increased from 687 in 2006 to 764 in 2010. Over the same time period the acceptance rate of original articles has decreased from 34 to 20%, whereas the number of citations to Respirology papers has steadily increased from 851 in 2006 to 1991 in 2010. The Journal's impact factor is currently 1.865 and expected to increase over the coming years. A key to the continued growth of the Journal's standing is its Editorial Board, who act as ‘gatekeepers’ for the Journal by ensuring that only the highest quality manuscripts are accepted. Rapid, high-quality reviewer feedback to submitting authors is essential, and it is impressive to note that the time to the first decision has decreased from 50 days in 2006 to 34 days in 2010. The current team of 20 Associate Editors and 31 Editorial Board members come from 11 countries in five continents. These individuals provide the Journal with a broad range of expertise. All are outstanding researchers in their own right, and each has a strong publication record. I would like to welcome the most recent Associate Editors: Assistant Professor Neil Eves from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Associate Professor Claire Wainwright from the Queensland Children's Respiratory Centre at the Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; and Assistant Professor Marcos Restrepo from the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas, USA. I would also like to welcome Associate Professor Graham Hall from the Department of Respiratory Medicine at Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth, Australia and Dr Yuan-lin Song from the Department of Pulmonary Medicine at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai China, who have both recently joined our Editorial Board. Professor Grant Waterer from the School of Medicine and Pharmacology at the University of Western Australia has completed his term as an Associate Editor, and I would like to sincerely thank him for his outstanding input to the Journal's activities. A full listing of the current Editorial Board can be found on the inside front cover of each issue of Respirology and on our website. I look forward to continuing many of the initiatives that Professor Lee has instituted. For example, in 2012, Respirology will continue its Review Series; each of which will consist of between 6 and 14 ‘themed’ review papers. Some of the series planned for 2012 include: ‘Obesity and Respiratory Diseases’, to be edited by Amanda Piper; ‘Translational Advances in Respiratory Diseases’, to be edited by David Lam and John Heffner; ‘Stem Cells and the Lung’, to be edited by Philip Thompson and Yuben Moodley; and ‘Air Pollution and Lung Health’, to be edited by Ian Yang and Stephen Holgate. In 2012, Respirology will also continue its Ad Hoc Reviews and Think Tank Reviews on areas of interest to the readership of the Journal that do not necessarily fit under the theme of a Review Series, as well as the successful Pro-Con Debates and Guest Editorials from invited experts on selected manuscripts from the same issue. These review articles are particularly important today, given the huge quantity and ease of access to research papers and the variable quality of them. Review series such as those published in Respirology provide an opportunity for experts to collate and summarize current knowledge of topics relevant to the Journal's readership. Although citations to these reviews are a useful marker of their impact, it is not the only one. For example, in 2010, Lange and Mori's review on Advances in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis1 was downloaded 2064 times and Klingsberg, Mutsaers and Lasky's review on Current Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis2 was downloaded 1187 times, perhaps indicating that these reviews are being used as useful reference documents by clinicians. While steadily increasing its profile on the international stage, Respirology must also maintain its prominence in Asia and Australasia, as it is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology, the official English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. The Journal's administrative activities remain extremely well supported by an experienced and efficient Editorial Office, including Dr Lieve Bultynck, Dr Naomi Alexander, Dr Christel Norman and Dr Neil Misso. However, it is mainly due to the remarkable efforts of the previous Editors in Chief, Professor Gary Lee and before him, Professor Philip Thompson, that I have been presented with a journal that continues to make a strong regional and international contribution in understanding and better treating respiratory-related disease. I look forward in helping the Journal continue to grow over the coming years.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,060
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,062

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,060
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,004
Communication savante0,0110,012
Science ouverte0,0040,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0190,030
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,014

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,191
Tête enseignante GPT0,466
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRespirologyMême sujetDelphi Technique in ResearchTravaux en français237 207