Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Human physiological judgment of dietary lipids (fats) is driven by the lipid-theory of Ancel Keys published in 1954. it says that higher fatty acid and cholesterol content of animal fats can be accused for the leading mortality factors just as cardiovascular diseases, in other terms hypertension and heart attack resulting from arteriosclerosis. social effect of the theory was enormous. A cholesterol hysteria spread over the world (after some twenty years also in Hungary), cooking technologies changed, animal fat intake dropped by 25% while that of plant fats jumped four times higher, total fat intake increased by 30%. rate of energy intake from fats in developed countries reached 40-42% instead of the recommended 30% value. in details it meant the blaming of animal and plant lipids with higher saturated fatty acids (sAfA) – among them milk fat (butter) – and the laudation of plant oils with high polyunsaturated fatty acid (pufA, mainly omega-6) content. the scientific and practical dominancy of the theory was so strong that no remarkable (even nobel prize winning) findings could shake its position. Beginning from the last decade of the 20th century, however, three major breaking points appeared in the frontline of dietary fats. Even separately but also together these three findings gave the final jab to the theory. As an effect of the new findings lipids with saturated fatty acids and cholesterol became secondary risk factors while plant oils (saffron-, sunflower-, walnut-, wheat germ-, cotton seed-, soybean-, corn germ- and sesame seed oils) rich in pufA became the primary ones. the three findings are as follows: - in 1992 the Harvard team of Willet alarmed the world that hydrogen treatment of plant oils result in formation of trans fatty acids and through the oxygenated ldl (oxldl) these acids are main factors of arteriosclerosis. in 2002 the institute of medicine of the national Academies declared that “trans fatty acid tolerance of human body is zeroâ€. in some countries (denmark, Canada, usA) legal regulations have been put in effect. - At the end of the century it was proved that omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids if their ratio exceeds 3:1 or max 5:1 are potent factors of arteriosclerosis (beside causing other diseases and complaints just as allergy, psoriasis, migraine, periods pain, premature birth.) in Hungary the same ratio is 97:1. - in 2005 the final jab to pufA-rich oils was performed by prof. Aignes saari-CsallAiny of university of minnesota when she and her team proved that during frying the pufA oils formed highly citotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic aldehyd compounds (HnE, HHE, HoE, HdE.) toxic compounds can be found in fried meals (just as french fries, breaded meats) in the same concentration. such compounds fail to form in lipids with low pufA content. - the paradox quoted in the title has a dual meaning: first is that the practice failed to follow the science and the second is that the „extreme unction†for the lipid theory was given where the theory itself was born.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».