Peter Pan's Shadows in the Literary Imagination
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PETER PAN'S SHADOWS IN THE LITERARY IMAGINATION. Kirsten Stirling. New York: Routledge, 2012. 188 pp. 9780415888646. $125.00. PETER PAN'S SHADOWS IN THE LITERARY IMAGINATION, Kirsten Stirling's study of literary legacy of J. M. Barrie's Pan, came about, according to author, as a result of teaching play Pan in a first-year seminar at University of Lausanne. Stirling acknowledges in her introduction that it is not her intent to give a complete critical history of Pan, that her focus is beginnings and endings, sources and sequels (5), and her intent is to explore ambiguities in Barrie's play that have invited later writers to fill in gaps at either end of story and provide interpretations of their own (5). While Stirling accomplishes her goal to focus on beginnings and endings, sources, prequels, and sequels, a lack of overt connection between discussions in individual chapters at times obscures through-line of her argument. Chapter One traces textual origins of Barrie's play, addressing emphasis on authorship and storytelling that Barrie employs in many versions of story of Pan. From its beginnings as a part of storytelling in novel The Little White Bird (1902)--later published as Pan in Kensington Gardens--and adventures with vacationing Llewellyn Davies family recounted in The Boy Castaways (1901) through its long stage history and novelization of 1911 to final published play of 1928, Barrie emphasized communal nature of story's authorship, even going so far as to deny memory of having authored it in his introduction to published version. Storytelling, as Stirling points out, is at core of work in all its forms, as a series of characters tell each other stories for various reasons and with various motivations, some benign but many dangerous to point of deadliness. Chapter Two considers origins of Pan in rich theatrical tradition of English pantomime, as Pan long remained a staple of Christmas season in London, competing for its audiences with popular Christmas pantomimes. Stirling deals with extensive textual changes that occurred over years of writing and productions as Barrie toyed with and largely rejected pantomime possibilities in story of Pan. Stirling further notes pantomime qualities that remain: echo of skin parts in dog-nurse Nana, traditional use of an actress to play Peter, Captain Hook as an exaggerated pantomime villain (29), and employment of audience participation in scene where children are asked to clap in order to save life of Tinker Bell. Stirling goes on to discuss significant ways in which Pan deviates from pantomime tradition, primarily in its complex ambiguities regarding nature and even identity of its protagonist; its themes of love, life, death, and maturity; and even its function as a play for a mixed audience of children and adults. Chapter Three deals with what Stirling calls the opposed fantasies of and (63) as two main characters vie for role of protagonist and clash over their competing desires for domestic, adult bliss and eternal youthful adventure. Here author deals with uneasy sexuality inherent in Barrie's text--and in critical commentary on it--noting that while Pan is irresistible material for psychoanalytic criticism, as is life of Barrie himself, attempts to impose a Freudian Oedipal on Pan tend to be problematic largely because relationships in play defy these easy designations (47). However, Stirling also notes that a reading of Neverland as unconscious reveals disturbing elements, including a deep-seated fear of female sexuality which underlies irreconcilable trajectories of Wendy and Peter (47). While this chapter may be too brief to truly deal with issues it raises--issues which are at core of Barrie's complex and ambiguous treatment of themes of love and sex, life and death--Stirling does a credible job of at least presenting questions to be answered and acknowledging scholarship of those who have gone before her in Barrie studies. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle