MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1519405674

Peter Pan's Shadows in the Literary Imagination

2012· article· en· W1519405674 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kayla McKinney Wiggins

Notice bibliographique

RevueMythlore · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAdventureStorytellingLiteratureHistoryArgument (complex analysis)ArtArt historyNarrative
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

PETER PAN'S SHADOWS IN THE LITERARY IMAGINATION. Kirsten Stirling. New York: Routledge, 2012. 188 pp. 9780415888646. $125.00. PETER PAN'S SHADOWS IN THE LITERARY IMAGINATION, Kirsten Stirling's study of literary legacy of J. M. Barrie's Pan, came about, according to author, as a result of teaching play Pan in a first-year seminar at University of Lausanne. Stirling acknowledges in her introduction that it is not her intent to give a complete critical history of Pan, that her focus is beginnings and endings, sources and sequels (5), and her intent is to explore ambiguities in Barrie's play that have invited later writers to fill in gaps at either end of story and provide interpretations of their own (5). While Stirling accomplishes her goal to focus on beginnings and endings, sources, prequels, and sequels, a lack of overt connection between discussions in individual chapters at times obscures through-line of her argument. Chapter One traces textual origins of Barrie's play, addressing emphasis on authorship and storytelling that Barrie employs in many versions of story of Pan. From its beginnings as a part of storytelling in novel The Little White Bird (1902)--later published as Pan in Kensington Gardens--and adventures with vacationing Llewellyn Davies family recounted in The Boy Castaways (1901) through its long stage history and novelization of 1911 to final published play of 1928, Barrie emphasized communal nature of story's authorship, even going so far as to deny memory of having authored it in his introduction to published version. Storytelling, as Stirling points out, is at core of work in all its forms, as a series of characters tell each other stories for various reasons and with various motivations, some benign but many dangerous to point of deadliness. Chapter Two considers origins of Pan in rich theatrical tradition of English pantomime, as Pan long remained a staple of Christmas season in London, competing for its audiences with popular Christmas pantomimes. Stirling deals with extensive textual changes that occurred over years of writing and productions as Barrie toyed with and largely rejected pantomime possibilities in story of Pan. Stirling further notes pantomime qualities that remain: echo of skin parts in dog-nurse Nana, traditional use of an actress to play Peter, Captain Hook as an exaggerated pantomime villain (29), and employment of audience participation in scene where children are asked to clap in order to save life of Tinker Bell. Stirling goes on to discuss significant ways in which Pan deviates from pantomime tradition, primarily in its complex ambiguities regarding nature and even identity of its protagonist; its themes of love, life, death, and maturity; and even its function as a play for a mixed audience of children and adults. Chapter Three deals with what Stirling calls the opposed fantasies of and (63) as two main characters vie for role of protagonist and clash over their competing desires for domestic, adult bliss and eternal youthful adventure. Here author deals with uneasy sexuality inherent in Barrie's text--and in critical commentary on it--noting that while Pan is irresistible material for psychoanalytic criticism, as is life of Barrie himself, attempts to impose a Freudian Oedipal on Pan tend to be problematic largely because relationships in play defy these easy designations (47). However, Stirling also notes that a reading of Neverland as unconscious reveals disturbing elements, including a deep-seated fear of female sexuality which underlies irreconcilable trajectories of Wendy and Peter (47). While this chapter may be too brief to truly deal with issues it raises--issues which are at core of Barrie's complex and ambiguous treatment of themes of love and sex, life and death--Stirling does a credible job of at least presenting questions to be answered and acknowledging scholarship of those who have gone before her in Barrie studies. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,031

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,012
Communication savante0,0070,011
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,246
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMythloreMême sujetFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesTravaux en français237 207