UM171 Is a Novel and Potent Agonist Of Human Hematopoietic Stem Cell Renewal
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Various combinations of soluble factors have been reported to promote the ex vivo proliferation of human HSCs but few of them are capable of promoting self-renewal. Characterization of StemRegenin (SR1), an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) antagonist that promotes expansion of CD34+ cells ex vivo, provided a proof of principle that low molecular weight (LMW) compounds have the ability to modulate cellular pathways possibly leading to HSC expansion. In an attempt to identify novel putative agonists of HSC self-renewal, we tested a library comprising > 5,000 LMW molecules in a phenotypical screen based on in vitro expansion of CD34+CD45RA- cells. Eight hits were identified, the majority of which were AhR antagonists. Validation studies identified one hit synthesized in our institute which potently expanded human CD34+CD45RA- cord blood cells ex vivo. Importantly this molecule does not antagonize AhR. Structure activity relationship (SAR) generated a compound called UM171 which is 14-25 folds more potent than the starting molecule with an EC50 of 8-15 nM on CD34+ human cord blood (CB). Using the optimal dose of this analog, CD34+, CD34+CD45RA-, and CD34+CD38-CD90+CD45RA-CD49f+ were expanded 115±15, 62±3 and 121±6 fold respectively over the input values after 12 day culture in fed-batch system. The expansion of these phenotypic HSC populations was enhanced, in an additive manner by including SR1. Washout of UM171 led to a rapid loss of the CD34+CD45RA- population suggesting that its effect is reversible. UM171 is not a mitogen and cannot compensate for the absence of cytokines added to the media (Flt3L, SCF, and TPO). Our cell division studies revealed no effect of the compound on division rate compared to control indicating that UM171 cultured cells retain the CD34+CD45RA- phenotype. Apoptosis and cell phonotype analysis showed significantly less cell differentiation and cell death for UM171 cultured cells compared to controls or SR1 supplemented cultures suggesting that the compound acts by anti-differentiation/apoptosis. Similar to SR1, UM171 treated cells showed a 75±20 fold net increase in the numbers of multilineage colony forming cell (CFU-GEMM) and 150±20 fold when both compounds were present in the 12 day culture.To further understand the impact of UM171 on more primitive cell compartments, we transplanted 100, 500, 1000 and 10,000 uncultured CB CD34+ cells and their progeny after a 12-day culture (with or without UM171) in NSG mice and verified the human hematopoietic reconstitution in their bone marrow 20 weeks later. Mice transplanted with UM171 expanded cells showed a much higher level of human CD45 engraftment compared to uncultured or control expanded cells. The NSG Repopulating Cells (NRC) showed a net expansion ex vivo only in the presence of UM171 with values ranging from 3.1 to 5.5 fold increase over input value in 6 independent experiments. Interestingly, the co-treatment with SR1 did not significantly enhance the impact of UM171 on NRC expansion. In these fed-batch conditions SR1 treatment maintained the NRC population at input values. Importantly, we observed a linear relationship between the number of UM171-treated cells transplanted in vivo and level of human CD45 engraftment. Moreover, at limit dilution, these cells were capable of human myeloid and lymphoid differentiation in NSG BM environment suggesting that UM171 expanded cells remain multipotent. Together, our studies have identified a novel compound which truly expands human progenitors while amplifying the more primitive stem cell population. UM171 has successfully passed toxicity studies and is in the final phase of GMP production for a phase I study which will be launched shortly. In addition, preliminary evidence suggests that UM171 strikingly enhances gene transfer efficiency to primitive human CD34 CB cells. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».