MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1523633441

Religious Education in Government--Run Primary and Secondary Schools in Poland and Canada (Ontario and Quebec)--An International Focus.

2007· article· en· W1523633441 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Teresa Anne Hughes, Norman L. Butler, Mary Alice Kritsonis, William Allan Kritsonis, David Herrington

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligious Education and Schools
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceReligious educationPrimary educationInstitutionSociologyCompulsory educationPublic administrationPedagogyEconomic growthLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to compare the teaching of religion in government –run primary and secondary educational institutions in Poland and Canada (Ontario and Quebec). The theoretical framework for this work is supplied by the general idea that the school is an organization and social institution. It is concluded that religious instruction in schools is a contentious matter in both Poland and Canada. ___________________________________________________________________ Purpose of the Article The purpose of this article is to compare religious instruction in government-run Polish and Canadian primary and secondary educational institutions. The comparison is limited to the school systems in Canada’s two most populated provinces: Ontario and Quebec. Primary and Secondary Education in Poland and Canada Unlike Poland, Canada does not have a national system of education each province and territory has its own system of schooling. One advantage of having separate school plans in a country as large as Canada is that regional needs are more likely to be dealt with. Conversely, a single system of schooling might strengthen Canadian identity. Polish and Canadian educators are sensitive to the linguistic needs of minority groups. Generally speaking, the language of instruction in Polish schools is Polish, but there are provisions for Slovaks, Ukrainians, Jews, Germans, Byelorussians and Lithuanians to be taught all subjects in their own language (Janowski, 1992, p. 49). Likewise, “minority language education” (English or French) is provided for in Canada (Council of Ministers of Education, Canada). Both Poles and Canadians are committed to the notion of compulsory education and public (state) schooling. Poles start school at age 7 and can leave at age 18; Canadians are expected to begin their studies generally between 5 and 7 years of age depending on the province or territory and remain in school until they are 16 or older (Council of Ministers of Education, Canada). As a matter of fact, there are guarantees in both countries for private schools and special education. Perhaps, the main feature of Polish and Canadian education respectively is: 1) the studying of West European languages at an early age which are of benefit to Poles in the European Union and 2) religious tolerance (Johnson 1968, p. 5). For example, in some Canadian provinces, there are separate school systems based upon religious preference, Ontario and Saskatchewan. Motivation for the Study The motivation for this work is Poland’s deputy education minister’s recent (October, 2006) call for a discussion about the teaching of Darwin’s theory of evolution in Polish schools (http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061014/scafp/polandeducationsciencereligion061014145 504). Mr.Miroslaw Orzechowski is, of the opinion, that the 19 century British scholar’s view is false. His remark underlines the conflict between religious and scientific explanations about the origin of man given to Polish students. The theoretical framework for this work is supplied by the general notion of the school as an organization and social institution. Religious Instruction in Canadian and Polish Schools In Poland, primary and secondary school students receive instruction in faith based religion or ethics (http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2005/51573.htm). Parents can ask for instruction in an any of the legally registered religions, and the instructors are paid by the Polish Government, ( During the Communist Period religious education took place outside of the school system). Given that most Poles are Roman Catholics most of the classes in religion are taught by representatives of the Catholic Church: clergy and non-clergy. Younger learners might find the study of religion difficult because teaching by subject does not take place in Polish schools until junior secondary school (Kucinska, 23, February, 2000). In Ontario, there are publiclyfunded public and Roman Catholic schools. Other Christian denominations and religions do not obtain such financing which is unfair (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_canada). Government-funded faith based schools ought to be available to all citizens of Ontario, however, it might be difficult for educators to implement such a policy. Furthermore, parents are not required to send their children to Roman Catholic schools, and single faith religious education is denied to learners in public primary and secondary educational institutions (http://christianity.ca/education/christian-schools/2003/06.003.html). An optional “course in ethics or religious culture” will take the place of religious instruction by 2008 That suggests that scientific (and not religious) explanations concerning the origin of man are important to educators in the Province of Quebec. Parents and Roman Catholic Church officials in the Province are understandably upset by the government’ s current program claiming that it undermines Quebec’s Christian heritage. Interestingly, relatively more learners (17%) attend private schools in Quebec than in any other Canadian province (http://www.ourkids.net/quebec-privateschools.php). This suggests that many parents are dissatisfied with their province’s public educational system.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,103
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,911

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetReligious Education and SchoolsTravaux en français237 207