MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W152486682 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.9.621

We're listening: Members help inspire reflection at the Canadian Paediatric Society

2004· article· en· W152486682 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Denis Leduc

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Health
Établissements canadiensCanadian Paediatric Society
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésActive listeningPublic relationsVariety (cybernetics)Value (mathematics)PsychologyMedicineMedical educationNursingPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Not another survey! That might be what some members of the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) thought when they received a questionnaire last fall asking them what they value about their membership. The CPS routinely surveys its more than 2000 members on a variety of topics to help design, deliver and evaluate programs and services. Surveys help ensure that we are responsive and accountable to the people who make up the organization. We polled members about continuing professional development and healthy active living. In the most recent survey, we canvassed members to better understand their perspective on the CPS. What is most important to them? What's working? What needs improvement? Our hope is that the answers to these and other questions will help us build an even stronger CPS, one that is more accessible and attractive to an increasing number of people who care about children and youth. Because the more voices we have, the more effectively we can advocate for the health needs of Canada's children and youth. Advocacy is one of the top three reasons why many have chosen to join and remain with the CPS. Over and over, members told us to continue to push for public policy changes that will benefit children and youth. And they told us to do even more. We were encouraged by both the comments and the response rate. Twenty-four per cent (486 of 2005) answered the questionnaire and more than one-half of those took the time to provide additional feedback. What we heard both confirmed some of our hunches and gave us pause for thought. For instance, when we asked what members value most about their membership, the top responses were Paediatrics & Child Health and position statements (86% and 85%, respectively). Following those were advocacy on behalf of children and youth (54%), the annual conference (42%) and public education (38%). (Members could choose more than one response.) These are the areas on which the CPS focuses the bulk of its resources and it will continue to do so. What was most telling about the survey were the members' comments. Several clear themes emerged which we hope will enhance our work and inspire other members to take a more active role in the CPS. One of our goals in understanding more about our members is to increase the value of CPS membership. Physicians and other health care providers have a number of options when it comes to joining a professional or medical association, and we recognize that many will have to make difficult choices. We also want to be more responsive to and reflective of the diversity of our membership, whether you define diversity by geographical location, practice specialization or other parameters. We believe that if we can meet our members' needs, they will help us accomplish our most important goal, which is to be a passionate, effective voice for children and youth. Over the coming months, the Board of Directors and staff will be looking more closely at the survey data to determine how we can use the feedback to strengthen existing programs and services, and develop others for consideration. In the meantime, I'd like to highlight some of the comments and discuss how these ideas can help build an organization where everyone who cares about children and youth feels at home. One of the challenges of an organization like the CPS is to offer programs and services that appeal both to generalists, such as community paediatricians and family physicians who care for children and youth, and subspecialists, from developmental paediatricians to emergency physicians. Indeed, a number of subspecialists have said that they wish the CPS was more relevant to their practices. One answer has been the development of sections, or networks of people with an interest in a particular area of child and youth health. Sections provide educational and networking opportunities, and many take on their own special projects. Many of the society's 13 sections have been active for years, such as the neonatal-perinatal medicine and residents' sections, while others are just getting off the ground, such as the sports medicine and child maltreatment sections. The community paediatrics and neonatal sections sponsor awards to recognize outstanding colleagues, while the international health section provides grants to residents doing electives in developing countries. What makes sections even more exciting is that they are formed by members, for members. Sections are just one way for subspecialists to get involved in the CPS. Paediatrics & Child Health encourages submissions from subspecialists, and has cultivated relationships with CPS sections and allied organizations to ensure that the journal carries a range of content. Also, many of our national programs depend on subspecialty involvement. Our healthy active living program, for instance, is led by a multidisciplinary group with experts in sport medicine, adolescent health and gastroenterology, among others. Subspecialists were not the only ones who commented on the need for a relevant organization. Overall, members said they want a professional association that understands their needs as busy practitioners and works to support them. With members separated by geography, and with many feeling isolated in remote or rural areas, it can be difficult to create a sense of community. While we know we can do more, the CPS is using technology to help bring members together. Our Web site, which includes a member centre, has tools and services to help members connect with one another, including a searchable directory. Our newly launched electronic newsletter aims to keep members up to date on the latest news from both the CPS and the world of Canadian paediatrics. We are strengthening our public education program so that members feel better equipped to counsel patients and families. Our Web site for parents, / , offers hundreds of documents (with new ones each month) that can be downloaded and shared with patients and families. The site (English and French) receives more then 75,000 visits each month. We're also working to develop more print materials, such as brochures, for those without Internet access. Since it was founded in 1922, the CPS has distinguished itself from other organizations with its focus on advocacy for children and youth. The CPS was instrumental in such public health measures as the addition of vitamin D to milk, childproof safety caps for medications and seatbelt use for children. Over the past five years, the CPS has rejuvenated its advocacy efforts, taking on issues such as immunization, paediatric human resources, childhood obesity and injury prevention. Members clearly want us to continue in that direction. They want us to be relentless in getting child and youth health issues on the public policy agenda. Our Action Committee on Children and Teens continues to work at setting advocacy priorities and determining effective ways to get the government's ear. The involvement of our members across the country is critical to successful advocacy programs. With the richness of their experience and expertise, members can support national advocacy efforts and work for change at the local and regional levels. The CPS has developed a series of tools (available online in our member centre) to help members advocate on behalf of children and youth in their own communities. Health professionals are constantly learning, and while much of it happens in the practice setting, formal courses and conferences are a critical part of our continuing professional development. Members told us that they look to the CPS for quality education and want more of it. They want annual conferences that are stimulating and relevant to their practices, and they want short continuing medical education programs delivered close to home. The CPS is working to deliver on both fronts. Our 2004 annual conference, in conjunction with the Association des pédiatres du Québec, attracted nearly 800 delegates to Montreal – our biggest ever. In response to feedback from members, we developed a Lifelong Learning in Paediatrics program that delivers two regional continuing medical education programs annually. In 2005, courses will be offered in Banff, Alberta, and La Malbaie, Quebec. Members are encouraged to contribute to the annual conference by submitting research, or proposing a workshop or session. Calls for abstracts and sessions are announced each year on our Web site. The CPS also helps educate practitioners through its position statements. Developed through expert committees, these position statements are the standards adhered to by clinicians and policy makers who want to make the best decisions about child and youth health. Each CPS committee is made up of a group of volunteers who collectively dedicate thousands of hours each year and who represent the best in Canadian paediatrics today. The opportunities to contribute to the CPS are almost limitless. Many of our more innovative programs and services are the result of the imagination and passion of our members. For those of you who already belong, we invite you to get involved. If you are not already a member but want to know more about how you can work with a dynamic group of people who want to give Canada's children and youth their best opportunity for optimum health, contact us. For more information on our programs and services, or to learn how to join or get involved with the CPS, visit our Web site at www.cps.ca or call 613-526-9397.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,041
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,138
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,433
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,862

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0410,138
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0320,012
Communication savante0,0140,012
Science ouverte0,0040,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0140,030
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0340,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,352
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetChild and Adolescent HealthTravaux en français237 207