MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1524883265 · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03765.x

Children’s seizures caused by continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol analgesia: two rare case reports

2012· letter· en· W1524883265 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaoqiang Li, Yunxia Zuo, Yuee Dai

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatric Anesthesia · 2012
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineVeterinary
ThématiqueVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTramadolAnesthesiaAnalgesicDosingBradycardiaLocal anestheticSurgeryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir––Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic. It has become the most prescribed opioid worldwide (1). It has been reported to cause seizures in therapeutic dosing and in overdose in adults, but rarely in children. We present two cases of children’s seizures caused by continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol for postoperative analgesia. The purpose of this letter is to show that the dosage may be an important factor in causing this severe side effect, especially in children and in patients who have a history of convulsions. In addition, we may avoid using tramadol in combination with medicines that lower the seizure threshold. That may cause us to be cautious about the future application of this drug. A 2-year-old male child weighing 12·5 kg was scheduled for urethra plasty because of congenital hypospadia. His past medical history and physical examinations (including body temperature) were negative. No previous seizure or seizure-like activity had been reported by his parents. Normal caudal block procedure with common amide local anesthetic was applied before the operation. 2 mcg of sufentanil was given at the beginning of the operation. After the operation, a continuous intravenous pump containing 0·75 mg·kg−1·h−1 of tramadol and 0·125mg·h−1 of granisetron was given for postoperative analgesia. Four hours after he arrived in the ward, his parents noticed that his face had turned blue. Other symptoms of seizure observed at this time including a vertical epileptic gaze, a lockjaw, a deviation of the mouth and a stiffening of the extremities. The SPO2 decreased to 80% and the heart rate dropped from 150 to 80 min−1 soon afterward. The pediatrician gave him 70 mg of phenobarbital and 4 mg of etomidate and immediately performed intubation, shortly after which the seizure ceased. No allergy-causing medicines were used during the postoperative period. No further problems other than a little agitation were observed after a 5-day follow-up. A 5-month-old male child weighing 8 kg was suffering from a teratoma and was scheduled for a tumor resection. His past medical history was negative, and his mother’s pregnancy and her delivery were uncomplicated. He underwent an operation under general anesthesia. A pump contains 0·2 mg·kg−1·h−1 of tramadol, and 0·5 mg·kg−1·d−1 of granisetron was applied for analgesia. Five hours after surgery, the child showed signs of stiffening in all four extremities and a vertical epileptic gaze. He was treated with 5 mg dexamethasone and received intensive care. The pump was turned off by the medical staff, and the seizure-like activity ceased 5 min later. The boy suffered a slight fever during the following 2 days. No seizure-like activity was observed during this period. Both focal and generalized seizures have been observed in patients after receiving tramadol in overdose (2,3), but rarely after receiving the recommended dose (4,5). By January 2005, the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (ADRAC) had received a total of 921 reports involving tramadol, of which 66 described convulsions. Some of them were new-onset seizures. In 27 of these cases, tramadol was the only drug suspected of being the cause of these seizures. But it is rare in reports of young children. Two infants poisoned with tramadol ingested by negligent supervision in a recently case series (6), both presenting with either seizure or seizure-like activity. Previous US studies suggest a relatively low risk of seizures with tramadol, unless it is taken by people with epilepsy or taken with other drugs that lower the seizure threshold (7). In these cases, the only drug suspected of lowering the seizure threshold is granisetron, the effect of which has been proven only in animal trails (8). In our country, the use of tramadol is restricted only for lactating women. We also notice that there is no intravenous formulation in some countries such as Canada. We have no idea whether the prescribing of tramadol should be restricted in patients within a certain age range or with a history of certain diseases like epilepsy. In our observation, in the first case, the boy received an overdose of tramadol (0·75 mg·kg−1·h−1), and in the second case, the dosage given was 0·2 mg·kg−1·h−1, which is within the recommended range. These cases have shown that tramadol may cause seizures not only in adults but also in children; and not just in the case of an overdose but also when administered within the normal range. Furthermore, the size of the dosage may be an important factor in causing this severe side effect, especially in children and in patients who have a history of convulsions. In addition, we should avoid using tramadol in combination with medicines that may lower the seizure threshold. The primary goal of treatment for severe tramadol-caused seizure should focus on breathing and circulation support. Any ongoing seizure activity should be treated with benzodiazepines. Intensive monitoring and supportive care should also be applied. No conflicts of interest declared.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,306
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePediatric AnesthesiaMême sujetVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaTravaux en français237 207