MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1524985

Governmental and institutional tort liability for quality of care in Canada.

2007· article· en· W1524985 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Lorian Hardcastle

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueMedical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTortDissenting opinionLiabilityHealth careLawDuty of careDutyHealth lawProfessional responsibilityLegal liabilityPolitical scienceMedicineNursingBusinessHealth policyInternational health
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The past hall century has been marked by the expansion of the law of torts and, especially, responsibility for negligence. No citation of authority is necessary to show that, in order to meet new situations in a rapidly changing society, Courts have greatly expanded the concept of the duty owed to others by persons and institutions. [T]he responsibilities of the hospital to the patient have expanded greatly in breadth and depth in this century.... Public expectations that hospitals will provide total care and make all arrangements are influencing courts in determining the responsibilities of hospitals. If the hospital is to bear more responsibility for the doctor, present systems and organization may have to be reviewed. (1) ********** These quotations express the need of the common law to evolve and reflect societal changes in health care, the perspective of the dissenting judge, Blair J., in the seminal Canadian case on hospital liability, Yepremian v. Scarborough General Hospital. (2) However, the majority of Canadian courts do not support Blair J.'s view and have allowed health sector tort law to remain stagnant, failing to recognize major changes in the health care system. Historically, physicians were perceived as solely responsible for patient injuries, while hospitals merely provided a location for a physician to practice and nursing staff to assist the physician in this endeavour. The patient had limited legal relations with the hospital itself and consequently, the hospital owed the patient few legal obligations. The duties imposed on the hospital corresponded to its limited role in the delivery of health care--the provision of competent staff and the maintenance of an adequate facility. But over the last 100 years, medical care has fundamentally changed, becoming more complex, technologically advanced and specialized. The hospital is no longer merely a place where a doctor treats a patient, but a sophisticated facility designed to provide a plethora of services from a wide variety of health professionals. For example, in the case of emergency services, a patient expects treatment from the hospital's emergency team--whatever combination of physicians, nurses, and other practitioners with which the hospital chooses to staff the emergency room. The patient also knows she may have contact with other practitioners and that radiologists, pathologists or pharmacists may be involved in her treatment. Given this matrix of care, it is natural for a patient not to look solely to one's own physician for care, but to the hospital itself. Hospitals and other institutions have responded to the complexity of modern medicine by taking on a greater role in organizing and managing the delivery of services, and coordinating the diverse staff and programs. Organization and management has extended to activities related to quality of care, such as forming quality-control committees and creating policies relating to patient outcomes. (3) Similarly, the role of provincial governments in health care has undergone a significant transformation, as part of a larger trend towards state involvement in social services. (4) Historically, its primary role was public health and limited funding of health services for the destitute. (5) The transformation in the state's role began with it undertaking the financial responsibility for physician and hospital services for all citizens, and then extended to a number of other programs, such as mental health services and prescription drug costs for certain residents. (6) But as publicly funded health care became en trenched in the Canadian identity, government increased its involvement in the governance, management and administration of the system. Motivated by its enormous public investment in health care and growing public concern and expectations, (7) the state has developed an interest in issues such as quality of care and patient outcomes. Governments now take an active role in setting the overarching policies that guide the way the system operates and evolves. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,836
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,969

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,007
Communication savante0,0090,002
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,073
Tête enseignante GPT0,408
Écart entre enseignants0,336 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed→Même sujetMedical Malpractice and Liability Issues→Travaux en français237 207→