Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Bushy (2000) points out that “nursing practice in rural environments are very similar in Canada, the United States, and Australia” (p. 236). I think we can now add Japan to that list of countries in which rural nursing has similar characteristics. I recently returned from the island of Honshu in Japan and had the good fortune to meet and discuss rural nursing with a large group of nurses who work at the nursing school attached to Jichi Medical School. They recently received a mandate from the Japanese government to create the Academy of Rural and Remote Nursing at Jichi and are planning on becoming involved in the ICN rural and remote network that is being established.If you are anything like me, before I went to Japan I found it hard to believe that there would even be areas that are considered rural let alone remote in a country as densely populated as Japan. Much to my surprise I found out that because much of the country is very mountainous there are communities that are as isolated as any remote area in Canada. Interestingly, many of these locations have a similar demographic structure to areas in rural Canada, with the majority of residents being either very young or very old.It never ceases to amaze me that despite language differences, cultural differences and differences in health care systems that rural nurses from various parts of the world have so much in common. During my stay in Japan I was asked to be part of a panel discussion with nurses who work in a variety of rural areas throughout the country. I heard stories about lack of anonymity and familiarity in the community, something that could have happened anywhere in a rural community in Canada. I must say that this identification with other rural nurses regardless of culture or language bodes well for the establishment of an international network that will foster the sharing of ideas and concerns. I also think that it is comforting to know there will be a network of like-minded individuals that share many of the concerns and issues of nurses working in isolation, so ultimately no rural nurses need to feel that they are alone.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».