163: Evaluation of an eLearning Module for an Effective Well-Baby Visit Using the Rourke Baby Record
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With the emerging evidence that early childhood development and experiences affect not only learning, but also lifelong physical, mental and emotional health, it is important that medical students learn to conduct effective comprehensive well-baby/well-child visits. The Rourke Baby Record (RBR) is a Canadian evidence-based validated system for well-baby/well-child care from one week to five years of age. E-Learning has gained popularity as a new approach to medical education. To assess medical student knowledge of well-baby care and the RBR before and after completing an eLearning module of a six month well-baby visit of a healthy infant. To obtain student feedback regarding the module content, clinical applicability, and web delivery. Module development began with a medical student summer research award, enabling a student vision for the module format, and involved an instructional design specialist in addition to family physician and paediatric faculty. Participants were medical students from two stages of training: preclinical second year (Y2) and third year clerkship (Y3). The data was analyzed for: 1) knowledge gains using a pre/post test of 10 MCQs; 2) module satisfaction using a questionnaire. Most survey questions used a 5-point Likert scale with results grouped into three categories: agree (strongly agree or agree), neutral, or disagree (disagree or strongly disagree). The 121 student participants comprised 96% of the two medical school classes. Both Y2 and Y3 students had a significant increase in their post test scores (P<0.001). For most MCQs, the Y3 students scored slightly higher. Module completion time averaged 90 minutes (range 20 min to 3 h). The extensive involvement of a medical student and an instructional design specialist resulted in a creative, visually appealing module. On average, 90.9% of students answered satisfaction survey questions positively. The majority of students indicated the module should be part of the curriculum, significantly more by Y3 students (78.8% of Y2; 98.0% of Y3 students, P=0.030). More Y3 than Y2 students felt the module enhanced their knowledge (P=0.016) and provided learning applicable to patient care (P=0.022). Suggestions for improvement were largely focused on web delivery and test questions. This eLearning module was an effective tool to teach medical students how to conduct a six month well-baby visit. The module was popular with students; suggestions for improvement were minor. A second module of an 18 month well-child visit is currently under development.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle