Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The International Wound Journal came of age at the recent World Union Congress 2008 in Toronto. As we celebrated our fifth Birthday the Journal’s profile was high and mighty recognising its significant International awareness and its growing importance as a valuable tool for the many wound care providers around the world. Starting with our Congress focused issue, a whopping edition with over 200 pages with some significantly important evidence based articles supporting many of the initiatives launched at the congress. Included in this edition were two supplements presenting further evidence based information to help with practice. One of these supplements provided consensus opinion regarding infection. This was the first time that the IWJ has been involved in the original publication of an International consensus statement. Like those we have published before we thank Medical Education Partnership and Smith & Nephew for the opportunity to be the first to publish this around the congress recognising its international importance. Is this a model for the future for the dissemination of these important consensus statements – we certainly hope so! The added benefit for all carers around the world is the listing of these important documents on Medline – making them more readily accessed and disseminated. In addition to our bumper congress edition we also provided the delegates of the congress with a ‘Birthday Gift’ which included the top 10 articles, which were accessed online from our first 4 years of publication. Copies of this reprint will be available at most major wound care conferences during 2008. To our readership and authors we say a huge thank you for helping the IWJ reach this level of importance and profile in such a short time frame. The congress also saw the creation and launch of a new tool to not only disseminate information/evidence more effectively, but also help the environment – that was An Electronic Poster Library, which the IWJ was only to happy to sponsor. This was a CD based tool which contained electronic copies of many of the posters presented at the Congress allowing the delegates to peruse them at their leisure and also to reduce both the cost and carbon foot print created with paper based handouts. As Editor-in-Chief of the IWJ I am proud of what we have achieved in such a short time frame and also delighted to see what we achieved during the World Union Congress in Toronto. This event saw a double celebration being our fifth Birthday and the third Congress. The IWJ however would not have got where it is today if it were not for our readership, authors, Editorial Executives and Board and also our Strategic Partners. So to all of these individuals I say a huge thank you and look forward to working with them in taking the Journal from strength to strength. The success of the IWJ is indeed a shared success and the partnership will continue as we move forward.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».