MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1529750039

Family Business Succession: What Are the Ways Used by the Men Business Managers to Legitimize Their Successors?

2014· article· en· W1529750039 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vivi Koffi, G. Fillion, Jean-Pierre Booto Ekionea, Tania Morris

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œentrepreneurial executive · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueFamily Business Performance and Succession
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSuccessor cardinalSuccession planningFamily businessMarketingEcological successionManagementLegitimacyBusinessWorkforceSociologyPublic relationsAccountingEconomicsPolitical scienceLawEconomic growthMathematics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACTThis paper aims at helping entrepreneurs to make their family business succession successful. Among the success factors of the succession, the successor's legitimacy seems determinant. This exploratory study involving five cases of succession by men predecessors shows that the outgoing leader can increase the legitimacy of his successor by helping him to develop his skills, by giving him responsibilities and authority, and by helping him to show his ability to be successor and to be respected.INTRODUCTIONFor Aronoff and Ward (1994) as well as Bruce and Picard (2005), the family businesses represent a model for the future, not only because the values they convey and their commitment in their respective communities on the redundancy and cultural plan (Astrachan & Shanker, 2003; Deloitte & Touche, 1999), but also because they establish a driving strength of the economic growth. Indeed, only in Canada, they represent about 75% of all the companies, with approximately 45% of the Gross National Product (GNP), and they provide work for 50% of the workforce (Cadieux & Brouard, 2009; Family Firm Institute, 2003; Le Breton-Miller et al., 2004; Richer et al., 2004; Sharma, 2004).However, most of these companies face a problem of transmission. According to the results of the study conducted by Bruce and Picard (2005), 41% of the business managers are going to transfer their company before the next five years and this proportion will reach 71% in the upcoming 10 years. But only 35% of the business managers have a plan to sell or transfer their family business. Bruce and Picard (2005) also argue that 10 years are needed approximately to prepare the succession in good conditions. In addition, according to the Oeuvre Suisse d'Entraide Ouvriere (OSEO) (2005), only 20% of the family companies succeed in the passage of the first to the second generation in the six years following the transfer by the manager.The success of the transmission is depending on a variety of factors. It is associated, not only to the predecessor's decision to leave (Lansberg & Astrachan, 1994) or to let go (Bah, 2008; Brun de Pontet et al, 2007), but also to the succession planning (Sharma, 2004; St-Cyr & Richer, 2005), and to the successor's ability to take the lead (Venter et al., 2005). Other authors emphasize the predecessor's skill to establish good relations with his successor (Cabrera-Suarez, 2005; De Massis et al., 2008; Garcia-Alvarez et al., 2002).Other studies have been performed on the successor's skills to assume his leader's role (Mitchell et al., 2009; Venter et al, 2005), but also on his experience (Le Breton-Miller et al., 2004), commitment, satisfaction, and motivation (De Massis et al., 2008). For other authors, some dynamics should not be neglected, for example, the transmission of good values to the successor (Garcia-Alvarez et al., 2002), the successor's development (Cabrera-Suarez, 2005), the importance for the successor of feeling integrated throughout the process (Haberman et al, 2007; Koffi, 2008), and the predecessor's disengagement (Bah, 2008; Cadieux, 2007). Finally, a particular and growing importance is accorded to the acquisition of legitimacy which, according to numerous authors, is a success factor of the business transmission (Barach et al., 1988; Culliere, 2010; Koffi, 2008; Sathe, 1985).The need to support the predecessors in a successful succession brings all its relevance to the main objective of this research. This objective is to grasp the predecessor's behavior to legitimize his successor. Several studies indicate that the men business managers adopt a different leadership from those of the women in a similar position (Bass, 1990; Eagly et al., 2003; Koffi, 2008). The diversity needed to face the complexity in the transmission of companies justifies the interest to analyze the succession behaviors according to the predecessor's gender. In this study, the specific objective is then to understand and to describe how the men family business managers near to retire bring their successors to gain their legitimacy in the company, while this legitimacy seems to be very important for the timelessness of the company (Barach et al. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,170
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œentrepreneurial executiveMême sujetFamily Business Performance and SuccessionTravaux en français237 207