MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1532652530

Jeri Wine and the Feminist Party of Canada

2007· article· en· W1532652530 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Angela Miles

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsSociologyLesbianHonourGender studiesDowntownFeminismEmperorLawMedia studiesPolitical scienceHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I worked closely with Jeri Wine the Feminist Party of Canada. Founded 1979, the was a high profile, vibrantly successful, visionary challenge to male politics as usual for a few years before succumbing to our failuthe inability to capitalize on the potential this fast growth offered (Carey, 1979; Pawlenko, 1979; Tillotson, 1980). At the time I was teaching courses at Atkinson College, York University while I finished my doctorate at U of T and Jeri was a young faculty member at OISE/UT. As founding members of the Party we both marveled at and welcomed the broad involvement of women from walks of life, levels of education, ages, orientations and political experience. In Toronto, lesbian and straight women, with and without children, single and with partners, from downtown and suburbs, employed and unemployed, on welfare and off, from Toronto and from away, without high school and with PhDs came together the Feminist Party of Canada. While the FPC included politically experienced feminist radicals, its main potential (for both growing numbers and creative challenge to established ways of doing and seeing things) came from the many women who joined with little experience of parliamentary politics and no loyalties to any existing parties or practices. The irreverent and angry women who were new to politics were very clear that the Emperor had no clothes and were not too shy to say so. They were determined to do things differently, to honour different values and behaviour and to make a new world. Jeri was one of the most passionate and active of these, one of the central core of movers and shapers of the Party's politics, culture and spirit. The Feminist Party of Canada worked collectively and democratically, reached out to women, and gave everyone a chance to use and develop skills, to be radical and angry, to have fun, and to question deeply. We (not necessarily this order and generally simultaneously) developed policy; opened an office; partied and built a social life together; organized forums on major policy and issue areas; wrote briefs, position papers, policy documents, manifestos, press releases, speeches, flyers; spoke on TV and radio, to reporters, public meetings, school and work groups, and on doorsteps; researched voting systems and women's parties and feminist political initiatives elsewhere; got the necessary 10,000 signatures to become an official political the Province of Ontario; formed membership committees, education and outreach committees, policy committees, reading and study groups, neighbourhood/riding groups; joined all party panels discussing policy and issues of the day - the FPC's passion, vision, eloquence, honesty, egalitarianism and radicalism contrasting strikingly and refreshingly with the behaviour allowed politicians from other parties. All the while, we debated whether to run candidates and, if so, when and how to do this a way that would re-shape politics rather than re-shape ourselves. We faced the ongoing challenge of figuring out how to change politics while participating it and whether this was really possible. Should we try? Or should our electoral activity prioritize education, movement building, cultural change and challenge rather than getting elected? (Zaborsky, 1987). While there were varying positions on electoral strategy, everyone the Feminist Party of Canada agreed on the central importance of maintaining a high activist profile with such controversial actions as the annual Remembrance Day ceremony at Old City Hall Toronto. Hundreds of women each brought a flower in memory of women who are victims of wars past, present, and future, the world over. Broadside, the Toronto feminist newspaper, reported the words that Mary O'Brien spoke at this event on November 11, 1979: On this day, when we remember the agonies which war brings to the lives of ordinary people, the women of this city remember too the grief, terror, and violence which have always been part of women's experience of war. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,101
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,732

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0410,006
Communication savante0,0120,003
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,299 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207