MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1533915525

Do Oil Companies Routinely Price Gouge the Public

2010· article· en· W1533915525 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronald A. Stunda, George I. Voltz

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademy of Accounting and Financial Studies journal · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMonopolyEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Petroleum industryOligopolyMonetary economicsBusinessCommerceMarket economy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION In recent years there has been much discussion on whether or not oil companies arbitrarily increase the price of gasoline at the pump. This has been exacerbated by the profits these companies have shown in recent quarters. Many studies have been undertaken to analyze if indeed price gouging is the driving force leading to these profits. Anderson (2006) asserts that oil company profits do not contribute to higher gas prices. Krantz (2007) states that the relationship between oil and gas prices is cyclical. He concludes that profits are influenced by factors such as world-wide demand and the associated cost of production. Barley (2006) posits that the key influencing factor is the series of mergers and joint ventures that preceded the run up in oil company profits. While Jenks and Clark (2007) state that this is an old issue that dates back to the days of the Standard Oil monopoly. We have too few players today, thus resulting in an oligopoly situation where a few control profits. These findings indicate that there can be quite a bit of disagreement on what has caused oil company profits to spike and to what extent, if any, the oil companies are seeking unfair profits. One thing that cannot be overlooked is the fact that in the fourth quarter of 2007, the net profits of the top five oil companies amounted to $22.55 billion compared to $1.59 billion in the fourth quarter of 2001. And therein lies the crux of the matter. The investing and consuming public is fixated on net profits or the bottom line. And why not? Net Income is used as a basis to determine return to the stockholder, a key indicator of wealth building. But there is also another element that goes virtually unnoticed in the financial report, the profit figure. Many items, both operating and non-operating in nature, are deducted from gross in arriving at net profit. These are important items because, among other things, they aid in assessing the company's ability to manage in a responsible manner. So when we look at the net income for an oil company, or any company, we have difficulty in determining if the profits are due to price gouging or maybe just good management skills. Could there be another way of assessing if price gouging exists? Gross is the result of a company's revenue less the costs of manufacturing the product (i.e., material, labor and overhead). If a company finds itself paying more for the costs of production, they have two options; reduce other expenses (operating or non-operating) or increase prices commensurately, in order to maintain net profit. An easy way of maintaining gross goals is to pass any increase in production costs on to the consumers. This causes the gross percentage to stay constant. If there is an increase in the gross percentage, while costs of production are increasing, one can infer that the price charged to the consumers (resulting in the revenue of the company) has increased more than the increase in costs. Regarding the oil companies, their major cost of manufacturing, i.e., oil, has steadily increased over the past five years. How has the gross been affected during this period? No research has yet to answer that question. This study will extend prior research in attempting to ascertain if oil companies do indeed show indications of price gouging the consumers. In doing so three questions will be answered: 1. Have gross percentages for the major oil companies increased over the past five years? 2. Do gross percentages vary significantly between the major oil companies? 3. Do gross percentages for oil companies vary significantly from those in other industries? HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT If oil companies have been engaging in price gouging, one would expect to see an increase in gross levels over some period(s) in the past five years, indicating that the price charged the consuming public is greater than the cost paid for the elements of production. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,371
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,632

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademy of Accounting and Financial Studies journalMême sujetMarket Dynamics and VolatilityTravaux en français237 207