MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W153396171

"Scorn Not the Sonnet": Pushkin and Wordsworth (1)

2005· article· en· W153396171 sur OpenAlex
Kenneth H. Ober, Warren U. Ober

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGermano-Slavica · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSonnetPoetryIambic pentameterLiteratureArtElegyLamentPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1831, when Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin (1799-1837) asked friend to have St. Petersburg bookseller send me Crabbe, Wodsworth [sic], Southey, and Schakspear [sic] (Shaw, 2:482), he had already read Wordsworth with sympathetic comprehension, during previous year he had written sonnet closely modeled on one of Wordsworth's. Pushkin's three sonnets--four, if Elegy in seven rhymed iambic pentameter couplets included--were written in 1830. Though not line-by-line translation of Wordsworth's not sonnet; Critic, you have frowned, one sonnet parallels it throughout, even using first line as subtitle. Pushkin first encountered Wordsworth's sonnet in pirated 1828 Paris edition of his Poetical Works published by brothers John Anthony and William Galignani, presumably based on first English collected edition of 1827, in which not Sonnet first appeared. (Pushkin also had in his library Paris editions in English of, e.g., Coleridge, Shelley, and Keats; Crabbe; Hazlitt; Washington Irving; Thomas Moore; Walter Scott; and Southey [Wolff, 495, 497, 503, 504, 510, 517, 518].) We quote Wordsworth's sonnet here from Galignani piracy, which Wordsworth ruefully acknowledged is printed with admirable accuracy, I have not noticed single error that I am not myself answerable for (Moorman, 550 note): Scorn not Sonnet; Critic, you have frowned. Mindless of its just honours;--with this Key Shakspeare unlocked his heart; melody Of this small Lute gave ease to Petrarch's wound; A thousand times this Pipe did Tasso sound; Camoens soothed with it an Exile's grief; The Sonnet glittered gay myrtle Leaf Amid cypress with which Dante crowned His visionary brow: glow-worm Lamp, It cheered mild Spenser, called from Faery-land To struggle through dark ways; and, when damp Fell round path of Milton. in his hand The Thing became Trumpet; whence he blew Soul-animating strains--alas, too few! (Wordsworth, 119) In 1803, English Annual Review had dismissed sonnets as at best ... but stiff difficult trifles, and surely more remote from simplicity which they often affect than any other class of poems in our language (Havens, 521-22). In this sonnet Wordsworth refutes such critics, along with Samuel Johnson, who characterized Milton as a genius who never learned art of doing little things with grace (Hill, 4:305). Similarly, in 1793, George Steevens rejected sonnets from his edition of William Shakespeare because, he said, strongest act of Parliament that could be framed, would fail to compel readers into their service (Havens, 480-81). And dismissing sonnets of Edmund Spenser in 1798, Nathan Drake wrote the critic will recognise many of trifling conceits of Italian, but find little to recompense trouble of research (Havens, 481). In not sonnet Wordsworth regards form as vehicle either or private themes. Milton him exemplifies public sonneteer, while private themes preoccupy other poets he lists, all of whom drew solace from sonnet as either exiles or lovers (or both) (Johnson, 39). His omitting great French sonnet writers, Du Bellay, Marot, or Ronsard, would be inexplicable except that, as William Hazlitt noted in The Spirit of Age, Wordsworth condemns all French writers (as well of poetry as prose) in lump (Howe, 11:93). Wordsworth himself, in his sonnet Great men [Milton and some of his contemporaries] have been among us ..., says, ... France, tis strange, Hath brought forth no such souls as we had then. No master spirit, no determined road; But equally want of books and men! (De Selincourt & Darbishire, 3:116-17) Still, in his vindication of sonnet Wordsworth marshalled distinguished array of continental poets, Petrarch, Torquato Tasso, Camoes, and Dante, alongside British Shakespeare, Spenser, and Milton, last revered by Wordsworth as preeminent creator of sonnets springing from the strife/That animates scenes of life (Wordsworth, 125). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,666
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,484

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle