MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1534778512

The Spectator's Pleasure: Yeat's "Long-legged Fly"

2005· article· en· W1534778512 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tudor Balinisteanu

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational fiction review · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPleasureThe ImaginaryAestheticsBattlePoetryArtForgettingLiteratureVisual artsPsychoanalysisHistoryPsychologyCognitive psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper proposes an analysis of Yeats's poem Long-legged Fly based on the idea that the self is a space wherein imagination's drives inscribe ideographic realities of desire. I will argue that the re-presentation of such inscriptions in the presence of signs and symbols masks the absence of objective reality. Given that the sign is a landmark of memory, I will explore how remembering gives a pleasure that is anchored both in the reality effect of signs' presence and in the imaginary. In the first stanza we read: That civilisation may not sink, / Its great battle lost, / Quiet the dog, tether the pony / To a distant post. (1) The poet requires the reader to lower the pressure of immediate, objective reality so that the mind's eye can inspect the inner imaginative reality. On a metapoetic level the reader may now focus on the metonymic relation between objective and imagined reality, that is, on the way inner processes are structured so that their expression becomes part for whole. Imaginations are accounts of the past filtering into presence through the experience of the here and now. This is not to say that through imagination we can relive the past. We may live a contextualized past that resonates with present experience. Through imagination we nestle the past in the The reality we experience becomes sanctioned by memory, it becomes a site of memory. And we may speak of a memory of humanity if we trust it exists as Yeats does: Our master Caesar is in the tent / Where the maps are spread, / His eyes upon nothing, / A hand under his head (287). This passage from the first stanza functions as a metaphor: Caesar's mastery of unknown territories evokes the artist's mastery of the unknown spaces of the mind. Caesar's quest, the writer's work is to map these spaces out. But in the presence of the formed and civilized unknown (be that through conquering it in writing) the eye is fixed upon nothing. The passage evinces a paradox: mapping should stabilize (fix) the unknown, should offer a mantra for concentrating reality in the mind's eye. For bringing knowledge in sight, for offering insight into reality. Why, then, are Caesar's eyes upon nothing? Where has his quest brought him? How does the quest of writing reach into the unknown territory of the mind? In metaphorical perspective the first stanza conceptualizes the artist's work (his working) as a quest by resorting to accounts of historical events perceived to be similar in purpose. The purpose of the writer's work--of mapping out the spaces of the mind--shares in its essence with the civilizing purpose of a conqueror like Caesar. The metaphor's terms are structured around the dichotomy unknown/spelled out. While the metaphor is not striking, the way in which Yeats manages it is. Yeats conceptualizes the importance of artistic creation by referring to a historical situation that he feels is similar in process. But that situation (in our case, Caesar's) is itself an imagination of the past. The present (reality of writing, reading) is impregnated with actualized perceptions of the past, that is, it becomes a play of memories. In other words, describing the present is particularizing the past. The play is real and it is the reader's pleasure to decipher it. What he deciphers is imaginary, and that is also pleasurable: Like a long-legged fly upon the stream / His mind moves upon silence (287). Time is a stream. The mind forms the present out of memories by adjusting them idiosyncratically. What is really present is but the mind's movement, its construction of the present through mapping out the past; its making something out of nothing: a simile of presence out of projections of the past whose bringing up characterizes and defines present. This process itself is the present: the Yeatsean measured quietude. While the first stanza deals with imaginations of the past sited (sighted) in the present, the second stanza deals with the embedding of the past into present: That the topless towers be burnt / And men recall that face, / Move most gently if move you must / In this lonely place (287). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,837
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,354
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational fiction reviewMême sujetMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationTravaux en français237 207