MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1535137917 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab268

268 GERM CELL DEVELOPMENT IN EQUINE TESTIS TISSUE XENOGRAFTED INTO MICE

2004· article· en· W1535137917 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
R. Turner, Rahul Rathi, Ali Honaramooz, Wenxian Zeng, Ina Dobrinski

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSperm and Testicular Function
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesCanada Research ChairsSwedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
Mots-clésSpermatogenesisBiologySertoli cellAndrologyTransplantationTestosterone (patch)Germ cellSeminal vesicleCATSInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineProstate

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Grafting of testis tissue from immature animals under the back skin of immunodeficient mice results in complete spermatogenesis, albeit with different levels of efficiency in different species. While spermatogenesis develops comparably to that in the donor species in xenografts from pigs, sheep and goats, spermatogenic differentiation is less efficient in testis tissue from cats and bulls. Testicular maturation was significantly accelerated in rhesus monkey testis grafts whereas timing was similar to that in the donor species in cats and bulls. The objective of this study was to investigate if grafting of immature horse testis tissue would result in spermatogenesis in a mouse host. Small fragments of testis tissue (about 1 mm3) from four sexually immature colts (2-week-old Standardbred, 5- and 8-month-old ponies, 10-month-old Warmblood) were grafted under the back skin of castrated male immunodeficient mice (n = 5, 5, 10 and 5 recipient mice, respectively). Histological examination of the testis xenografts was performed between 14 and 50 week post-transplantation. Weight of the seminal vesicles in the host mouse was recorded as an indicator of bioactive testosterone produced by the xenografts. At the time of grafting, the seminiferous cords of the donor testis tissue form 2-week-, 5-month- and 8-month-old colts contained only immature Sertoli cells and gonocytes. No spermatogenic differentiation occurred in xenografts from the 2-week-old colt and testosterone production was minimal. Pachytene spermatocytes were observed in testis grafts from the 5- and 8-month-old donors from 14 weeks onward. Spermatogenesis did not proceed through meiosis in grafts from the 5-month-old donor. Recipient mice carrying xenografts from the 8-month-old donor received exogenous gonadotropins (equine chorionic gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin, 10 I.U./day for 2 months, beginning 14 weeks after grafting) and condensing spermatids were observed by 35 weeks after grafting. In donor tissue from the 10-month-old colt, pachytene spermatocytes were present in about 50% of tubules at the time of grafting. After 14 weeks, xenografts showed fewer differentiated germ cells than the donor tissue. However, at 35 weeks after grafting, condensing spermatids were observed, indicating that differentiated germ cells were initially lost and spermatogenesis was subsequently reinitiated. In all castrated host mice where spermatogenic differentiation occurred, the weight of the seminal vesicles was restored to pre-castration values showing that xenografts were releasing bioactive testosterone. These results indicate that horse spermatogenesis can occur in a mouse host albeit with low efficiency. Testicular maturation was not accelerated. In most cases, spermatogenesis appeared to become arrested at meiosis. The underlying mechanisms of this spermatogenic arrest require further investigation. Although equine testis xenografts produced testosterone, supplementation of exogenous gonadotropins might support post-meiotic differentiation. This work was supported by USDA 03-35203-13486.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,571
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,809

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentMême sujetSperm and Testicular FunctionTravaux en français237 207