MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1536130788

The Big Stink at Darius D'Amore's Fragrances, Inc

2009· article· en· W1536130788 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barry Armandi, Herbert Sherman, Daniel James Rowley

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the International Academy of Case Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueBusiness Law and Ethics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLawsuitBachelorPromotion (chess)ManagementPsychologyBusinessPublic relationsPolitical scienceLawEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

CASE DESCRIPTION This is a field-based disguised case which describes treatment of employees within Darius D'Amore's Financial Administration Division. case describes a brief history of several employees who filed a lawsuit against the firm claiming racial, disability and gender discrimination after they were overlooked for promotion, or were poorly treated, and eventually terminated. case has a difficulty level appropriate for a junior level course in human resource management, business ethics, or principles of management. case is designed to be taught in one class periods (may vary from fifty-five minutes to eighty minutes depending upon the course structure and the instructional approach employed) and is expected to require between four to six hours of outside preparation by students. CASE SYNOPSIS Derived from observation and field interviews, the case describes the plight of several workers within Darius D'Amore's Financial Administration Division and what incidents lead to their eventually filing a lawsuit against the firm. Rich Rogers, 43, had been with the company as a supervisor in the Corporate Credit Department since 1997. Mr. Rogers, a white male, had his Bachelor's degree in management and was enrolled in an MBA program at a local University. Rogers was fighting stage 4-lung cancer since 1996. His condition was not revealed to the Company or his co-workers until 1998. He made his condition known at that time because he needed to take a two-month leave to have bilateral lung surgery. Mr. Rogers, on several occasions, felt that he was passed over for promotion because of his illness and questioned why he was training his supervisors if he wasn't qualified for the job. When Rogers brought up several racial incidents to the head of the Division, Kevin Simmons, he was told to mind his own business and that no matter how hard you work, you will never be promoted. Several other racial and discriminatory incidents occurred that impacted and/or were observed by Les Ford, a 44 year old African American employee, and Jasmine Young, a 2 5 year old African American female. Their complaints to both management and human resource management went unheeded and eventually Rogers and Young were fired while Ford quit. case ends with the three of them bringing a lawsuit against the firm. INTRODUCTION The Job Position Opening Policy is to first post the job internally and if no qualified candidate is found, then the open position will be announced to the general public, stated Jeff Juda, Chief Financial Officer of Darius D'Amore, at a Finance Department meeting. Likewise, he continued, we fully abide by and support all laws and rules governing employment, especially those from the EEOC. What a load of bull! whispered Rich Rogers to Les Ford. Juda probably doesn't know what the hell's been going on in his own Department! But he will soon, responded Les. BACKGROUND Darius D' Amore Company was one of the world's leading manufacturers and marketers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care products. Darius and Dante D'Amore founded the Company in New York City in 1 945. Its products were sold in over 120 countries and territories under the following brand names: Darius D'Amore, Darius, Dante, Beginnings, Inferno, Heaven, Cleanique, Zodiac, Avalon, Madeline and Seasons. Each division had its own specific and unique image, advertising and merchandising strategy. Company was headquartered in New York City, with manufacturing facilities located in the United States, Belgium, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Canada. Company went international in London in 1960 and established a presence in Hong Kong in 1961. There were approximately 20,000 full-time employees worldwide. Company was publicly traded since November 1990, with members of the D'Amore family owning a majority of stock. Darius D'Amore Company sold its products through limited distribution channels, consisting mainly of upscale department stores (i. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,410
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,398

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,057
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the International Academy of Case StudiesMême sujetBusiness Law and EthicsTravaux en français237 207