MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1536894904

Epidemiology of road traffic accidents - A Prospective study at a tertiary University Hospital in Addis Ababa Ethiopia

2015· article· en· W1536894904 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Henok Seife, E Teffera

Notice bibliographique

RevueEast and Central African journal of surgery · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCase fatality rateRoad trafficEpidemiologyIncidence (geometry)Injury preventionOccupational safety and healthQuarter (Canadian coin)Public healthPediatricsProspective cohort studyPoison controlEmergency medicineEnvironmental healthMedical emergencySurgeryGeography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are major but neglected public health problems. Without appropriate action, by 2020, road traffic injuries are predicted to be the third leading contributor to the global burden of disease and injury. Most of the projected increase in road traffic crashes will occur in low- and middle-income regions of the world, Ethiopia is one of countries with the highest fatality rates worldwide. The road fatality rates have grown by a quarter in the some African countries like Ethiopia. The main objective of this study was to determine the epidemiological characteristics and outcomes of RTIs presenting at Tikur Anbassa Hospital (TAH) in Addis Ababa Ethiopia. Methods: All 210 patients involved in Road traffic crashes (RTCs) and seen at the Emergency surgical department at TAH over a one month period were included in the study. Patients aged under 13 years were excluded from the study. Data were collected by preformed questioners and was analyzed using statistical tool EPI info 2000. Results: The peak incidence was in the 21 – 30 years age group and accounted for 40% of cases. There was a preponderance of males who accounted for 67.6% of victims. There were 6 deaths giving 2.9% case fatality rate. Two of the deaths occurred on arrival while the other four died while receiving treatment. Eight (3.8%) of the cases were admitted and 37 (17.6%) were referred for admission at other hospitals. One hundred six (50.5%) of the victims had major injury while 104(49.5%) had minor injury. There were 5 cases of moderate head injuries and 14 cases of severe head injuries with 4 cases of vertebral fracture. Closed extremity fractures were 37 (24.2%), compound single fractures were 10(4.3%) and multiple fracture (either closed or compound) occurred in 15 (7.6%). Majority, 147(70.4%), of victims were from Addis Ababa. About 1 in 20 (5.2%) of the accidents happened on the highway. Vast majority of injuries were sustained by pedestrians 140(66.7%). Majority of patients presented to the OPD within 4 hours 120 (57.4%). Most of the injuries occurred during day time 151(71.9%). Hundred and thirty- one patients (62.4%) presented primarily to TAH. Majority of the drivers who caused the accidents were in the age group of 25 – 35 accounting for 39.5% of injuries. Commercial vehicles have caused the majority 72(34.3%) the injuries. Conclusion and Recommendation: Road traffic crashes are major public health problems in Ethiopia. There are lots of injuries requiring subspecialty treatment due to RTCs requiring the need of specialized treatment centres and specialists. There is a need of trauma centres in the country including the capital city with beds and equipment and personnel to handle the increasing RTC victims. There is need a lot to be done to improve awareness of the public both to the drivers and pedestrians about the safe use of roads and vehicles.   This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source (including a link to the formal publication), provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,417

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEast and Central African journal of surgeryMême sujetTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesTravaux en français237 207