Personality differences between alcohol and alcohol-energy drink users: an Australian survey
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: Several surveys have investigated the consequences of co-consumption of alcohol and energy drink (ALC/ED). These have often focused on negative drinking outcomes and alcohol consumption and often conclude that alcohol and energy drink co-consumption is associated with increased involvement in risk-taking behaviours. However, they typically have not examined other group differences which might predispose certain individuals to co-consume energy drink with alcohol. Nor have they explored the reasons underpinning the relationship between risk taking and alcohol and energy drink co-consumption.\nMethod: An online survey focusing on energy drink and alcohol consumption was advertised via word-of mouth, newspapers and social media. The survey consisted of two parts. Part 1 determined participants’ preference of drink type(s) (i.e. alcohol mixed with energy drink or another mixer, or alcohol alone) along with consumption patterns. Part 2 of the survey established scores across a range of personality traits.\nResults: A total of 1650 people completed the survey, 442 who consumed alcohol mixed with energy drink. Data were analysed by on one-way ANOVA comparing scores for those who did mix alcohol with energy drinks with those who did not. Those who did mix were significantly more likely to use illicit drugs within the past year (F (1,660) = 17.90, p < 0.001), to first consume alcohol at a younger age (F (1,660) = 5.08, p = 0.025) to drink more standard drinks per drinking occasion ( F (1,660) = 37.85, p < 0.001) and to drink on more occasions within the last 30 days (F (1,660) = 16.09, p < 0.001). Furthermore, compared with ALC alone, ALC/ED consumers had significantly higher alexithymia scores (trouble with identifying and describing emotions with a tendency to focus attention externally) compared with non-consumers (F (1,407) = 5.97, p = 0.016) as measured by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. No group differences were found on depression, anxiety or stress. scores.\nConclusion: These results indicate the presence of personality differences in alcohol and energy users compared to non-users. This finding emphasises the need for within group designs when comparing the consequences of co-consuming energy drink with alcohol and opens the possibility of using alcohol and energy drink use as a screening tool for potential behavioural problems.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».