Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2004, Ki Adams called and asked me if I would agree to give a keynote address to the 2005 Phenomenon of Singing Symposium.He asked me to speak about myself, my life, career, my decision to retire from performing.He asked me, too, to give some advice for young singers beginning in the life of a classical singer.The more I thought about it, the more daunting it became.Just to tell the story of my life, the highlights of my career, the people who have influenced me, and so forth, seemed insufficient.I would need, for my own sake, if not for yours, to make some sense of it all.I would need to decipher some pattern or scheme or unifying thread which would not only make a brilliantly executed speech, but which would also show that I have skilfully and unerringly navigated my way through the labyrinth of my life and career according to a brilliantly conceived master plan.And so, ladies and gentlemen, I have returned again and again in my thoughts to an examination of my life in search of the Key, the Pattern, the Plan.And I've discovered the following: 1. Whenever I had a plan, it seldom worked out the way I thought it would.But circuitous routes are often far more interesting and educational than the original plan provided for.2. If there is a unifying thread in the good things I've done professionally and my reasons for doing them, that thread is words-language-as a means of communication through music.My passion for speech and communication preceded my love of singing.When I was a child, we had a little neighbourhood boy who had a serious speech defect.This distressed me terribly.I spent as much time with him as I could keep his attention, trying to teach him to speak.I could not bear the difficulty he had to make himself understood.Later, in my late teens, I worked closely with two deaf sisters, even learned sign language so that we could communicate better.But what I really wanted was to help them speak clearly.Thus, it was that I decided speech therapy should be my chosen career.That was perhaps my first plan gone astray.I loved languages and studied German, as well as French, and Latin, all through high school.Little did I know then that that would be the most beneficial thing I could
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,015 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,010 | 0,017 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,054 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».