Monique Mohica and Ric Knowles, eds. Staging Coyote's Dream: An Anthology of First Nations Drama in English, Vol. I and Vol. II
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
MONIQUE MOHICA AND RIC KNOWLES, eds. Staging Coyote's Dream: An Anthology of First Nations Drama in English, Vol. I. Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press, 2003. 459 pp. MONIQUE MOHICA AND RIC KNOWLES, eds. Staging Coyote's Dream: An Anthology of First Nations Drama in English, Vol. I. Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press, 2008. 367 pp. Ric Knowles and Monique Mohica, of both volumes of Staging Coyote's Dream, are situated in Ontario. As collaborator, Mohica brings her history of being nurtured by Spiderwoman Theatre and her experience as an actor and playwright and collaborator with Turtle Gals Performance Ensemble. She is former artistic director of Native Earth Performing Arts. Knowles is Professor of Theatre Studies at Guelph University and an editor for Canadian Theatre Review. His books include The Theatre of Form and Production of Meaning, Shakespeare and Canada, and Reading Material Theatre; he is general editor of book series Critical Perspectives on Canadian Theatre from Playwrights Canada Press. The two volumes of Staging Coyote's Dream present collection of twenty plays by fifteen playwrights, published between 1986 and 2004, Volume I ending in 2000 and Volume II beginning in 1996. The playwrights are Native American writers from both Canada and US because, as explain in their introduction to Vol. I, the decision not to restrict plays to those produced within geopolitical boundaries of Canada makes two implicit claims. [...T]he right of First Nations peoples not to be subject to political or legislative regimes of later-day nations; [and ...] history that long precedes contact or colonization, that has not been superseded, and that cannot be circumscribed (iv). I make point of situating in Ontario because I believe this has bearing on choices of plays in these two anthologies. The playwrights who are included in these volumes are, for most part, connected by fact that they are a family of theatre artists who share aspects of their heritage and experiences of contemporary world (iv). I understand this quite literally for artists included seem to constellate around Spiderwoman Theatre in New York (Miguel, Borst, Mohica, Turtle Gals); Centre for Indigenous Theatre, founded by Favel (Toronto); and Native Earth Performing Arts (Toronto), with which number of playwrights have been associated (Moses, Highway, Taylor, Nolan, Mohica, Dandurand). The exceptions to these constellations are Shirley Cheechoo, founder of De-ba-je-ma-jig Theatre (also Ontario); Margo Kane and Marie Clements, west coasters; and William S. Yellow Robe Jr. from Montana. The certain experiences of contemporary world may also refer to post-colonial project of Native identity and weight of experience of colonial oppression which haunts and is, indeed, subject of many of plays in these two volumes. As teacher and director of works by Native playwrights, I admit to some curiosity as to why these particular plays/playwrights are included in this two-volume anthology. Anthologies, by their nature, suggest an editorial rationale for their contents; Knowles and Mohica, in their introduction to first volume, tell us that this is a collection of plays that appeals to us and challenges us as editors (iii). They take care to explain that they are not attempting representative collection but an eclectic selection of plays and playwrights. This disclaimer notwithstanding, I would appreciate more elucidation of their choices, particularly as second volume has little to offer by way of introduction and many of playwrights appear for second time, in their own right or as members of collectives. The second volume would gain by including excellent introduction from first volume which offers readers useful discussions of terminology in field that is developing in resistance to western forms of theatre, while, of necessity, using western concepts to explain itself and its projects. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».