MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1542571401 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab65

65 RARE AND OFTEN UNRECOGNIZED CEREBROMENINGITIS AND HEPATOPNEUMONIC CONGESTION ARE MAJOR CAUSES OF SUDDEN DEATH IN CLONED MALE PIGLETS

2004· article· en· W1542571401 sur OpenAlexafffund
M.R. Park, S.K. Cho, J.Y. Park, K.M. Kim, Young-Suk Choi, DaeJin Kwon, Kyu‐Chan Hwang, U.H. Tae, Won-rak Son, Seung Sam Paik

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNursing
ThématiqueInfant Nutrition and Health
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Mots-clésFetusBiologyUterusAndrologySpleenOvaryEmbryoLungPhysiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicinePregnancyImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In this study, we investigated the relationship between the sex of cloned pigs and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Three cell lines (2 male and 1 female) were obtained from F1 fetuses derived from 3 different dams (Yorkshire) inseminated by the same sire (Landrace); one female fibroblast cell line was obtained from a Duroc-strain fetus acquired from a slaughterhouse, the age of the fetus unknown. The fetal fibroblast cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum under 5% CO2 in air at 37°C. For NT, we used the 4 cell lines described above. All 37 cloned piglets derived from 10 pregnant recipients were alive at term and began breathing readily. Of those piglets born, 18/22 males and 5/15 females died within 2 months of age. A total of 350 paraffin blocks from 18 deceased cloned male piglets and 90 paraffin blocks from six age-matched normal control piglets were prepared from the midbrain, medulla oblongata, liver, lung, kidney, spleen, small and large intestine, thymus, uterus, placenta, ovary, testis, skin, and skeletal muscle. We found that the birth weights of male clones were 57% lower than those of control age- and sex-matched piglets. Piglets with low birth weight (<900 g) had more than twice the risk of SIDS relative to those piglets weighing more than 1000 g. The low birth weights of the cloned male piglets (0.84 ± 0.05 kg) were not merely an artifact, as the average birth weights of cloned female piglets (1.47 ± 0.09 kg) were not lower than weights of piglets produced by AI-derived control female piglets (1.36 ± 0.12 kg). An initial examination of brain samples from 18 cloned male piglets that died soon after birth identified seven piglets with meningitis characterized by severe neutrophilic inflammation in the temporal brain lobes (38.8%, 7/18). We verified meningitis when more than 1000 neutrophils were counted per cubic millimeter of tissue. Next, we found hepatopneumonic congestion (16.6%, 3/18). The deceased male clones with meningitis showed extensive neuronal cell death and blood-brain barrier damage, whereas cloned piglets with congestion had fewer and larger alveolar air sacs. Extensive alveolar cell death, especially of pneumocytes and the bronchial epithelium, was confirmed by TUNEL assay. Lung and liver congestion may be caused by a slowly flowing blood stream from heart, resulting in CO2 and O2 exchange problems. Although the gross anatomy of the cloned male piglets was normal, they were associated with other severe handicaps, the commonest being leg abnormality which occurred in 33% (6/18) of dead male cloned piglets followed by Leydig cell hypoplasia and short face. Even though 4 of 41 AI-derived control piglets died within 1 week after birth, we could not find any anomalies in them. Thus, the present study suggests that our data might reflect sex difference but not cell type difference, and that death of the cloned male piglets might be caused by risk factors of sudden infant death syndrome such as low birth weight and multiple organ failure in conjunction with hepatopneumonic congestion and cerebromeningitis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,620

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentMême sujetInfant Nutrition and HealthTravaux en français237 207