75 HIGHLY EFFICIENT AND RELIABLE CHEMICALLY ASSISTED ENUCLEATION METHOD FOR HANDMADE CLONING IN CATTLE AND SWINE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In bovine and porcine nuclear transfer, most traditional enucleation procedures require potentially harmful chromatin staining and UV illumination. The purpose of our work was to find an efficient and reliable chemically-assisted procedure for enucleation connected to the handmade cloning (HMC) technique without chromatin staining. Slaughterhouse-derived oocytes were collected and matured in vitro. At 21 (bovine) or 43 (porcine) h after the start of maturation, cumulus cells were removed with vortexing and oocytes were further incubated in the maturation medium supplemented with 0.5 µg mL-1 demecolcine for 2 h. Subsequently, zonae pellucidae were digested with 2 mg mL-1 pronase in the presence of 10% cattle serum (CS) for 6 to 8 min and washed in HEPES-buffered TCM-199 medium and 20% CS. Bisection was performed in the same medium by hand under a stereomicroscope by using a microblade. A small membrane protrusion observable on the surface of oocytes was used as an orientation point. One-third of the cytoplasm connected to this protrusion was removed, and the cytoplasts and karyoplasts were collected separately. Bovine cytoplasts were used as recipients for HMC experiments (Vajta et al., 2003, Biol. Reprod. 68, 571–578) with fetal fibroblasts as donors, and reconstructed embryos were cultured for 7 days. In Experiment 1 (3 replicates), the possibility of oriented bisection at different time points was determined on a total of 225 bovine oocytes. At 5, 15, 25, 35 and 55 min after the end of pronase digestion 64, 91, 93, 72 and 59% of oocytes had membrane protrusions (P < 0.05 between all groups, SAS Genmod) illustrating the time-dependent manner of the protrusion. In Experiment 2, the efficiency and reliability of enucleation was measured. Bisection was performed between 5 and 35 min after pronase digestion. Subsequently both supposed cytoplasts and karyoplasts were stained with Hoechst and investigated under UV light. In cattle (9 replicates), bisection was successfully performed in 94% (519/552) of oocytes, and 98% (507/517) of those bisected were enucleated, i.e. the chromatin was entirely in the presumptive karyoplast. In swine (3 replicates), 91% (302/331) of oocytes were successfully bisected and 95% (280/296) were enucleated. In Experiment 3 (cattle; 4 replicates), blastocyst per reconstructed embryo rates were 47% (139/293), illustrating the high developmental ability in vitro. Considering that no oocyte selection based on the presence of polar body was performed, the above system seems to be more efficient and reliable than other enucleation methods. Moreover, expensive equipment (inverted fluorescent microscope) and a potentially harmful step (staining and UV illumination) can be eliminated from the HMC without compromising the high in vitro efficiency.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».