MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1543712879 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab75

75 HIGHLY EFFICIENT AND RELIABLE CHEMICALLY ASSISTED ENUCLEATION METHOD FOR HANDMADE CLONING IN CATTLE AND SWINE

2004· article· en· W1543712879 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueReproductive Biology and Fertility
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Mots-clésCytoplastEnucleationPronaseCloning (programming)BlastocystStainingBiologyAndrologyAnatomyTheriogenologyEmbryo cultureMolecular biologyEmbryoCryopreservationTrypsinCell biologyBiochemistryEmbryogenesisGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In bovine and porcine nuclear transfer, most traditional enucleation procedures require potentially harmful chromatin staining and UV illumination. The purpose of our work was to find an efficient and reliable chemically-assisted procedure for enucleation connected to the handmade cloning (HMC) technique without chromatin staining. Slaughterhouse-derived oocytes were collected and matured in vitro. At 21 (bovine) or 43 (porcine) h after the start of maturation, cumulus cells were removed with vortexing and oocytes were further incubated in the maturation medium supplemented with 0.5 µg mL-1 demecolcine for 2 h. Subsequently, zonae pellucidae were digested with 2 mg mL-1 pronase in the presence of 10% cattle serum (CS) for 6 to 8 min and washed in HEPES-buffered TCM-199 medium and 20% CS. Bisection was performed in the same medium by hand under a stereomicroscope by using a microblade. A small membrane protrusion observable on the surface of oocytes was used as an orientation point. One-third of the cytoplasm connected to this protrusion was removed, and the cytoplasts and karyoplasts were collected separately. Bovine cytoplasts were used as recipients for HMC experiments (Vajta et al., 2003, Biol. Reprod. 68, 571–578) with fetal fibroblasts as donors, and reconstructed embryos were cultured for 7 days. In Experiment 1 (3 replicates), the possibility of oriented bisection at different time points was determined on a total of 225 bovine oocytes. At 5, 15, 25, 35 and 55 min after the end of pronase digestion 64, 91, 93, 72 and 59% of oocytes had membrane protrusions (P < 0.05 between all groups, SAS Genmod) illustrating the time-dependent manner of the protrusion. In Experiment 2, the efficiency and reliability of enucleation was measured. Bisection was performed between 5 and 35 min after pronase digestion. Subsequently both supposed cytoplasts and karyoplasts were stained with Hoechst and investigated under UV light. In cattle (9 replicates), bisection was successfully performed in 94% (519/552) of oocytes, and 98% (507/517) of those bisected were enucleated, i.e. the chromatin was entirely in the presumptive karyoplast. In swine (3 replicates), 91% (302/331) of oocytes were successfully bisected and 95% (280/296) were enucleated. In Experiment 3 (cattle; 4 replicates), blastocyst per reconstructed embryo rates were 47% (139/293), illustrating the high developmental ability in vitro. Considering that no oocyte selection based on the presence of polar body was performed, the above system seems to be more efficient and reliable than other enucleation methods. Moreover, expensive equipment (inverted fluorescent microscope) and a potentially harmful step (staining and UV illumination) can be eliminated from the HMC without compromising the high in vitro efficiency.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,635
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,504

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle