MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1544236850 · doi:10.1111/joa.12346

<i>“Something old, something new, something borrowed, something …. else</i>”

2015· editorial· en· W1544236850 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guy S. Bewick, Rade Durbaba, Susan Pyner

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Anatomy · 2015
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMedical Research Council
Mots-clésGlobeArt historyPsychologyHistoryNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This symposium edition is dedicated to Robert W. (Bob) Banks. It is a collection of presentations to mark the occasion of Bob's retirement from his full-time academic post in December 2013, after more than 40 years researching into the structure and function of the muscle spindle. On 4–5 September 2014, a group of more than 50 of Bob's friends and colleagues, both old and new, gathered at Collingwood College, University of Durham to celebrate the history, discoveries and future of research associated with Bob's time in the field. A very enjoyable 2 days of presentations, posters and discussions ensued from speakers spanning both Bob's entire career and the globe. Bob began his career as an anatomist, and this is where his initial discoveries were concentrated, resulting from his hallmark of dedication to detail and logical deduction. But one of his other great strengths was to then marry these discoveries to simultaneous physiological recordings, without which the further great insights into the neuroscience of this, the most complex sensory organ after the special senses, would not have been possible. The esteem in which Bob is held is reflected in how many of his older colleagues attended, many of whom are themselves long retired, hailing from Canada, Australia and China, as well as all over Europe and the UK. The articles in this symposium edition run the entire gamut from the detailed structure of the muscle spindle, to how this relates to its electrical output and their integration into motor circuits, and then on to how these basic principles might relate to other sensory systems (mechanical and otherwise) in mammals and other animals. They span from the ultrastructural to the whole body, from the anatomical to the mathematical, and from the invertebrate to the human. All of them influencing or being influenced by Bob's work. We hope experts and non-specialists alike will find this an insightful and enjoyable read, as we have endeavoured to make the volume as accessible as possible to a wide readership. To further increase this accessibility, several of the articles are written more in the style of reminiscences than standard scientific reviews. We feel these also give insights into the passion, enthusiasm and divergent views within the research field at various times in Bob's career, rather than simply reviewing the findings in the purely formal scientific format, fascinating though these findings are in themselves. This collection, therefore, represents a comprehensive view of our current understanding of the mammalian muscle spindle, how it relates to both other types of mechanosensory terminals and to other primary mechanosensation systems in other animals. We hope that you will enjoy reading this collection of works as much as we have compiling and editing it. It only remains to thank all those involved in helping us to compile this special volume. Most importantly, we thank Alex Probert, the Biophysical Sciences Institute and the School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Durham, without whose hard work, experience, funding, logistical support and co-ordination activities, the Mechano-‘reception’ simply would not have happened. We also thank for financial support the Physiological Society, who also designated the meeting a ‘Special Symposium’, and our industrial sponsors. Finally, we thank the Journal of Anatomy, especially Tom Gillingwater and Edward Fenton, for their unstinting support and patience as we amateurs have muddled through the process of compiling this invaluable collection.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,014
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,120
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante, Science ouverte, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,106
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0140,120
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,005
Science ouverte0,0070,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,015
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,336
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of AnatomyMême sujetHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceTravaux en français237 207