STRATEGIES FOR RESTORING ECOLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY AND ESTABLISHING WILDLIFE PASSAGE FOR THE UPGRADE OF ROUTE 78 IN SWANTON, VERMONT: AN OVERVIEW
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Vermont Route 78 travels through one of the largest and most significant wetland complexes in the State of Vermont. This fact is exemplified by the presence of the Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge and the Carmens Marsh State Wildlife Management Area as the primary landowners of this large wetland system. This mosaic of wetlands offers outstanding wildlife habitat for a myriad of resident and migratory species ranging from waterfowl (e.g., black ducks, wood ducks, goldeneyes) and wading birds (e.g., great blue herons, American bitterns, Virginia rail – the state’s largest colony of nesting great blue herons occurs in this wetland system), to rare, threatened and endangered species, such as the black tern and spiny softshell turtle. Although black bear and moose are not the common species in this part of the state, vehicle collisions with those species have occurred in the project area. Each year, many white-tailed deer are killed by vehicle collisions in one area of this roadway alone. Numerous other species of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians are killed by traffic in this area each year. Route 78 is a relatively narrow, winding road with an increasing volume of traffic, most notably commercial truck traffic coming from and going to Canada. Public safety concerns regarding the high traffic volume and poor road conditions have caused the Vermont Agency of Transportation to pursue upgrade of the road along the Missisquoi River and through the Mississquoi wetland system and Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge. In order to address safety issues related to the road conditions and the wildlife habitat and associated environmental concerns, a collaborative process was developed to identify issues and solutions. The Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife in coordination with the Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge and the Vermont Agency of Transportation identified impacts to wetland habitat, effects of traffic on sensitive wetland-dependent wildlife, and the barrier effect of the existing road conditions as primary concerns related to this project. In order to address those concerns, we evaluated landscape and habitat conditions along the road project corridor, distribution of road-related wildlife mortality, animal movement information based on evidence of animal movements and activity in habitats near the road (e.g., tracks, observations of animals), and local knowledge of animal movements and animal vehicle collision areas from Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge biologists and Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Game Wardens. Landscape analysis of this segment of Route 78 indicates an isolated area of upland habitat surrounded by wetland habitat associated with an S-curve in the road known as Louis Landing. Road-related wildlife mortality information indicates a high proportion of animal-vehicle collisions along the S-curve by Louis Landing suggesting that the upland habitat is serving as a primary travel corridor for many species of wildlife. Species that cross, or are likely to cross, within the wetland/upland complex along Route 78, such as deer, moose, black bear, mink, otter, beaver, muskrat, raccoon, coyotes, red fox, gray fox, other small mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and some birds, would utilize a transition zone between wetland and upland habitat which is provided by this area. As mentioned earlier, this is the only area where black bear and moose have tried to cross Route 78. In Vermont, we have found black bears are selective in their preference for locations to cross roads. This is a primary location where birds are struck by vehicles, including hawks, owls, waterfowl and songbirds. Additionally, we identified several other important wildlife linkage areas that traverse Route 78 as well as an important amphibian breeding area that requires large migrations of frogs to cross the road each year during spring spawning season. Based on this evaluation, we developed a “Route 78 Permeability Plan for Fish, Wildlife, and Ecosystem Functions.” The purpose of this plan is to identify the most significant wildlife habitat linkage areas along the road project corridor and identify measures for resolving road-related conflicts with those areas. The plan proposes the following measures for restoring and mitigating wildlife movement and ecological functions within the Missisquoi wetland system: A. Construction of a 500-foot-long span bridge in an area identified as Louis Landing. This is the primary linkage area. The dimensions of the underpass have been designed to accommodate spanning the entire linkage area to accommodate the needs of a variety of taxa and species. We believe that this strategy will reduce the risk that the structure would fail to serve the needs and interests of some of the species and/or taxanomic groups that require unrestricted movement in this wetland system. B. Shifting of the existing road at least 100 feet away from the edge of the Missisquoi River and restore that area to functional riparian habitat.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».