Decision-making by people living with HIV requires communication from clinicians about the risks of transmission despite undetectable plasma viral load
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We thank Engsig et al. [1] for their analysis of the possible sexual transmission of HIV from patients whose viral load is <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. The impetus for their work is the claim of the Swiss Federal Commission for HIV/AIDS that patients with undetectable plasma viral loads for six consecutive months are noninfectious provided that there are no concurrent sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Engsig et al. have found that regularly monitored HIV-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) may present a greater risk of transmission than purported by the Swiss statement, particularly in the initial 12 months of therapy. This finding, inferred from their data about the dynamic nature of plasma viral loads, is important and extends our knowledge about HIV transmission risk. One of several concerns with the Swiss statement is its reliance on data almost exclusively from heterosexual couples and the lack of evidence on the magnitude of transmission risks associated with low viral loads. Our recent work in Sydney [2] suggests that, despite the widespread availability of HAART, transmission rates among men who have sex with men (MSM) are now astonishingly similar to those seen in the pre-HAART era. Diagnosis rates have been increasing in Australia in an era of increased HAART coverage and effectiveness. Similar findings have been reported from France [3]. Although HIV may be undetectable in blood, it may be present in semen or genital fluids at infectious levels. Indeed, the association between plasma viral load and seminal viral load is far from perfect. For example, Lorello et al. [4] investigated 33 HIV-positive men who had plasma viral loads of <50 copies/mL for a mean of 3.96 years and who had been screened for STIs. Two of 33 men (6%) had detectable HIV in their semen. In another study, Sheth et al. [5] followed a prospective cohort of 25 men free of STIs initiating HAART. Despite their achieving a plasma viral load of <50 copies/mL, HIV was detectable in semen samples of 48% of the men on more than one occasion. In a control group of 13 other HIV-infected men who had undetectable plasma viral load at every 3-monthly assessment for the past 7 years, HIV was detected in semen samples in 31% of these men. Sheth et al. could not find any relationship between semen viral loads and the concentration of antiretroviral drugs in that compartment. HIV detected in semen samples was sensitive to drugs used by study participants. The degree of sexual infectiousness of MSM for given viral loads in plasma (or in semen or the rectum) is still not known. However, the results of Engsig et al., Lorello et al. and Sheth et al. underscore the possibility that, in some cases, HIV transmission may occur despite an undetectable plasma viral load. An undetectable plasma viral load does not imply an undetectable viral load in semen or rectal fluids. We encourage clinicians to communicate these results when counselling their MSM patients about the risk of HIV transmission while taking HAART. Such communication helps patients and their partner(s) make an informed choice about HIV risk.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».