Farming Women's Organisations: (Re) Constructing Farm Women's Identities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Farm women in Western rural societies make an invaluable contribution to farming and farming communities. However this contribution is underrepresented in agri-industry. Instead farm women are predominantly associated with traditional support and service identities, such as carers and farm helpers. This thesis argues that farming women's organisations create spaces and strategic bases from which farm women may either maintain hegemonic service identities or challenge these through the performance of alternative identities. It addresses questions about the contexts in which farming women's organisations operate; the hegemonic and alternative identities farming women's organisations make available to members; the identities farm women subsequently recognise; and the way in which these identities are maintained or challenged by the collective action of the organisations.\n\nThis study explores the identities and action of farm women and their organisations, in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. It constructs an analytical framework that enables an analysis of rurality, narrative identities, organisational collectivity and political action. This framework provides the basis for a feminist methodology which incorporates multiple, and predominantly, qualitative methods. Farm women members and representatives participated in the research through organisational semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and subsequent in-depth interviews. Data were used to determine collective identity, organisational type, narrative identities, and leadership as a form of collective action.\n\nThe results indicated that farming women's organisations might be placed on a continuum based on a number of dimensions. This continuum acknowledged, but also blurred the existing binary between established organisations and newer networks. The collective identities of the organisations indicated that both the internalised and externalised constructions of collective identity are dynamic, and influence the narrative identities of farm women and their actions. Overall, members of the established organisations acknowledged and performed service identities, and undertook leadership in a feminised context, characterised by reactive communality. In contrast, members of the newer networks recognised and expressed predominately occupational identities, and undertook leadership in a masculinised context, characterised by agentic competence. Exceptions to this, however, indicated that certain established organisations and newer networks might be placed towards the middle of this continuum, indicating a need to move beyond a binary categorisation of farming women's organisations. \n\nIn sum, the thesis has demonstrated that the spaces and practices that farming women's organisations create are influential in maintaining or challenging ontological narratives which have informed dominant notions of rurality, including the hegemonic, traditional, service identities for farm women.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,025 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».