<i>Whales and Nations: Environmental Diplomacy on the High Seas</i> by Kurkpatrick Dorsey
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Whales and Nations: Environmental Diplomacy on High Seas by Kurkpatrick Dorsey. Foreword by William Cronon. Seattle and London, University of Washington Press, 2013. xxii, 365 pp. $34.95 US (cloth). In 1972 Reader's Digest published an excerpt from Canadian author Farley Mowat's A Whale for Killing, which told of his experience with a fin whale trapped in a cove near Burgeo, Newfoundland in 1967 and how local residents chose to torment whale rather than rescue it. As Kurkpatrick Dorsey observes, Mowat expressed and helped popularize sentiments that gained currency during 1970s and 1980s: people are fundamentally pretty ugly, but are pure. People could redeem themselves, though, by saving whales (p. 216). This understanding of was a new one. Throughout most of twentieth century, the dominant idea about was that they were strange and interesting, but they were first food and energy for humans (p. 10). Dorsey illustrates how, from early 1900s, whalers took advantage of new technologies that enabled them to hunt last great cetacean populations in Antarctic seas and reap profits from industrial demand for their oil. Even before World War I, some contemporaries had noted that whalers were following familiar cycle of finding a lucrative whale stock, rapidly increasing catches, and depleting resource until hunting was no longer profitable. A desire to prevent a recurrence of this pernicious pattern spurred international efforts to regulate whaling that are topic of Dorsey's rich and informative book. Drawing on an impressive array of archival sources from Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, Norway, and United States, Dorsey reconstructs history of whaling diplomacy: its beginnings in early twentieth century, signing of international conventions in 1930s and creation of International Whaling Commission (IWC) in 1946, and eventual passage of a moratorium on commercial whaling after 1982. Dorsey organizes book's highly readable narrative around themes of sustainability, sovereignty, and science. Throughout twentieth century, as Dorsey shows, enlightened observers pursued agreements that would facilitate more rational exploitation of resources and make whaling sustainable. The goal was not to save whales, but to curtail hunting so that industry would not collapse. Whenever discussions centered on conserving for future use, however, those who wanted fewer restrictions generally won out. Like Dorsey's previous scholarship, Whales and Nations reminds us that ecological processes, including whales' migratory patterns, inevitably transcend human-constructed political boundaries. Defining such boundaries, moreover, proved especially difficult in maritime environments. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,075 | 0,031 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».