Annotated Bibliography on Elementary School Counseling
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The counselors each evaluated their own groups and agreed upon the following statements: 1. Students in the groups seemed to develop greater insight and growth in interpersonal relationships. It would appear that students at this age level need structure initially to establish and orient themselves to the group situation. This then allows them to assume the responsibility of leadership when they are ready and willing to do so rather than be confronted with a very unfamiliar and frustrating situation immediately upon entering the group situation. 2. This was in most cases the students' first experience with a group situation in which there was an adult leader present who was prepared to share the leadership with them. This was, perhaps, the most significant experience for the students in the experiment. 3. In the structured groups the leader's role changed during the meetings from one of direction to one of facilitating group interaction. By the end of the experiment, students seemed ready to assume group roles of leading, questioning, and clarifying. The unstructured groups took longer to reach this stage than did the groups. 4. A thirty-minute counseling period would be more appropriate for the grade six groups, particularly in the early stages, as the attention span of this age group is still quite short. However, the students disagreed completely on these issues—fifteen felt forty minutes was just the right length of time and fourteen felt it was too short. 5. Heterogeneous groups seem more desirable because they promote greater interaction among all students. 6. Although the students reacted favourably to their counseling groups, most of them were opposed to weekly guidance classes with their own teachers. CONCLUSION After six months of group counselling the four counsellors involved felt that the project was successful. It was apparent that students improved their ability to interact with one another in a small group and to participate responsibly in group discussion and to respect the rights of others in the group. Although group counselling at the elementary school level is a relatively new area, we can see great possibilities of its being of benefit to this age group.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,014 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,216 | 0,057 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».