MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1546834015

Enduring Pasts and Denied Presence: Mi'kmaw Challenges to Continued Marginalization in Western Newfoundland

2014· article· en· W1546834015 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angela Robinson

Notice bibliographique

RevueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColonialismForegroundingState (computer science)PoliticsContext (archaeology)IndigenousStupidityEthnologySociologyPolitical scienceGender studiesPolitical economyLawGeographyArchaeologyEcology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Tyranny, stupidity and lack of vision have brought about what is now alluded to as the Indian Problem.Luther Standing Bear, Sioux, 1933IntroductionIn Canada, the forms of domination and preferred interest that marked colonization continue to affect the lifestyles and lifeways of Aboriginal peoples. This article derives from and responds to the need to approach Aboriginal studies in the context of applied anthropology, particularly as a form of social action focusing on the well-being of Canada's Aboriginal peoples. By foregrounding the negative effects of state policy and by critically examining the cumulative effects of colonial and state control, the centrality and persistence of dominant state discourses are called into question. Here, the struggle of the Ktamkukeweq (Newfoundland) Mi'kmaq to extricate themselves from a socio-political milieu, birthed in the colonial past and nurtured by the Canadian state, is examined.At first glance, the formation of Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nations Band (hereafter Qalipu Band) in September 2011 can be seen as a positive step forward for the majority of Mi'kmaq in Newfoundland and Labrador. However, as a landless band, its formation can also be viewed as a form of state repression within which Qalipu Band self-determination will be eclipsed by the state: under the Qalipu Band agreement, federal agencies will determine social and political orders and all rights to lands and resources are to be forfeited. In addition, the process through which the Qalipu Band was formed can be viewed as inherently flawed, in that approval for status is based on a set of criteria deemed legitimate by state agencies that is challenged by existing Mi'kmaw political organizations, such as the Grand Council and Mi'kmaw Kwilmu'kw Maw-klusuaqn Negotiation Office (MKMNO). In effect, the Newfoundland Mi'kmaq are to be governed by rules and regulations not of their own making and over which they have limited control. Arguably, while events of the past reveal the power of the state to define, control and forcefully assimilate the Mi'kmaq of Newfoundland, the formation of the Qalipu Band may be seen as another stage of the same process. Rather than viewing its formation as a point of arrival, it may be seen as a point of departure or as a tentative first step in a protracted struggle. Essentially, the true point of arrival will be marked by the validation of Aboriginal lifeways, rights and freedoms as determined by the Newfoundland Mi'kmaq themselves.MethodologyThe information presented here is based on ethnographic research and data drawn from historical documents, media reports, social media sites, archival data and court documents pertaining to the Newfoundland Mi'kmaq. Ethnographic data were collected between 2006 and 2012, during a series of community consultations, private and public meetings, personal interviews and informal conversations, through participant observation and via print and social media sites. I work and reside in the western region of Newfoundland, and, although non-Aboriginal, I am an active member of the Comer Brook Aboriginal Women's Association (CBAWA) and the Newfoundland Aboriginal Women's Network (NAWN), which has allowed for direct and significant personal experience with those seeking Qalipu Band membership.The ethnographic data informing this study were collected in the western, southwest and northwest regions of island Newfoundland and include general information on Mi'kmaw populations distributed throughout the province and within Eastern Canada. West Coast Newfoundland populations were selected because the majority of Newfoundlander residents claiming Mi'kmaw descent reside in the region, I live in close proximity to the target population and the Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nations Band office is located in Comer Brook, the largest West Coast centre in Newfoundland.2 Of the estimated 103,000-plus applicants for membership in the Qalipu Band, many, possibly the majority, reside outside the province. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,231

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0220,013
Communication savante0,0070,003
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Même sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207