MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1547137195 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05494.x

Bone marrow biopsy in thrombocytopenic or anticoagulated patients

2005· letter· en· W1547137195 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2005
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematological disorders and diagnostics
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBiopsyBone marrowHematologyWarfarinSurgeryAdverse effectTrephineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy are performed in an estimated 10 000 patients each year in the UK (Bain, 2004). A recent postal survey of members of the British Society for Haematology suggested that these procedures are generally safe, with adverse events being reported in only one per 1000 procedures (Bain, 2003, 2004). However, while complications are rare, they may be serious, and fatal outcomes have been reported (Le Dieu et al, 2003; Morley & Makris, 2003; Bain, 2004). The most frequently reported serious adverse event is bleeding. Patients with thrombocytopenia or receiving anticoagulant therapy with heparin or warfarin are likely to be at increased risk of bleeding following bone marrow biopsy but the optimal management of these patients at the time of the procedure is uncertain. Following the recent death of an Australian patient, who experienced a massive retroperitoneal haemorrhage after bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy was performed during warfarin therapy with an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.9, an email survey was conducted of members of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Hematology Society of Australia and New Zealand, to document current approaches to performing bone marrow biopsy among thrombocytopenic or anticoagulated patients. Recipients of the survey were also asked whether written informed consent was routinely obtained prior to bone marrow biopsy. A total of 104 of more than 400 persons on the Societies’ mailing lists responded to the survey. Most responses were from Australian or New Zealand haematologists but replies were also received from Cambodia, Singapore and the UK. The results are summarised in Table I. Most respondents indicated that they did not routinely transfuse platelets prior to bone marrow biopsy in thrombocytopenic patients. Approximately 20% stopped or reversed warfarin prior to biopsy, 10% performed a biopsy irrespective of the INR, and the remainder performed a biopsy as long as the INR was ‘acceptable’. Approximately two of three respondents routinely obtained written informed consent prior to bone marrow biopsy. This survey demonstrated a broad range of practices among haematologists who perform bone marrow biopsy in thrombocytopenic or anticoagulated patients. The widespread practice of performing a biopsy without platelet support or during warfarin therapy suggests that most haematologists do not consider thrombocytopenia or anticoagulation to be important risk factors for bleeding following bone marrow biopsy. Our survey has several limitations. First, those members of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Hematology Society of Australia and New Zealand who have previously experienced complications of bone marrow biopsy may have been less likely to respond to our survey. Secondly, haematologists may avoid performing a bone marrow examination or trephine biopsy in thrombocytopenic or anticoagulated patients. This information was not captured in the survey. Preventing adverse events after bone marrow biopsy is important for individual patients as well as public health. Extrapolating the UK data, it is likely that hundreds of thousands of bone marrow biopsies are performed worldwide each year. Assuming a complication rate of 0.1% (probably an underestimate because adverse events are often underreported), hundreds of adverse events occur worldwide each year. Accurate data on the incidence of complications following bone marrow biopsy in thrombocytopenia and anticoagulated patients are required so that appropriate management guidelines can be developed. This work was performed while I was in the Department of Haematology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia. I am grateful to the members of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Hematology Society of Australia and New Zealand who responded to this survey.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,434
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle