MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1547137195 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05494.x

Bone marrow biopsy in thrombocytopenic or anticoagulated patients

2005· letter· en· W1547137195 sur OpenAlexaff
John W. Eikelboom

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2005
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematological disorders and diagnostics
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBiopsyBone marrowHematologyWarfarinSurgeryAdverse effectTrephineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy are performed in an estimated 10 000 patients each year in the UK (Bain, 2004). A recent postal survey of members of the British Society for Haematology suggested that these procedures are generally safe, with adverse events being reported in only one per 1000 procedures (Bain, 2003, 2004). However, while complications are rare, they may be serious, and fatal outcomes have been reported (Le Dieu et al, 2003; Morley & Makris, 2003; Bain, 2004). The most frequently reported serious adverse event is bleeding. Patients with thrombocytopenia or receiving anticoagulant therapy with heparin or warfarin are likely to be at increased risk of bleeding following bone marrow biopsy but the optimal management of these patients at the time of the procedure is uncertain. Following the recent death of an Australian patient, who experienced a massive retroperitoneal haemorrhage after bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy was performed during warfarin therapy with an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.9, an email survey was conducted of members of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Hematology Society of Australia and New Zealand, to document current approaches to performing bone marrow biopsy among thrombocytopenic or anticoagulated patients. Recipients of the survey were also asked whether written informed consent was routinely obtained prior to bone marrow biopsy. A total of 104 of more than 400 persons on the Societies' mailing lists responded to the survey. Most responses were from Australian or New Zealand haematologists but replies were also received from Cambodia, Singapore and the UK. The results are summarised in Table I. Most respondents indicated that they did not routinely transfuse platelets prior to bone marrow biopsy in thrombocytopenic patients. Approximately 20% stopped or reversed warfarin prior to biopsy, 10% performed a biopsy irrespective of the INR, and the remainder performed a biopsy as long as the INR was 'acceptable'. Approximately two of three respondents routinely obtained written informed consent prior to bone marrow biopsy. This survey demonstrated a broad range of practices among haematologists who perform bone marrow biopsy in thrombocytopenic or anticoagulated patients. The widespread practice of performing a biopsy without platelet support or during warfarin therapy suggests that most haematologists do not consider thrombocytopenia or anticoagulation to be important risk factors for bleeding following bone marrow biopsy. Our survey has several limitations. First, those members of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Hematology Society of Australia and New Zealand who have previously experienced complications of bone marrow biopsy may have been less likely to respond to our survey. Secondly, haematologists may avoid performing a bone marrow examination or trephine biopsy in thrombocytopenic or anticoagulated patients. This information was not captured in the survey. Preventing adverse events after bone marrow biopsy is important for individual patients as well as public health. Extrapolating the UK data, it is likely that hundreds of thousands of bone marrow biopsies are performed worldwide each year. Assuming a complication rate of 0.1% (probably an underestimate because adverse events are often underreported), hundreds of adverse events occur worldwide each year. Accurate data on the incidence of complications following bone marrow biopsy in thrombocytopenia and anticoagulated patients are required so that appropriate management guidelines can be developed. This work was performed while I was in the Department of Haematology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia. I am grateful to the members of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Hematology Society of Australia and New Zealand who responded to this survey.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBritish Journal of Haematology→Même sujetHematological disorders and diagnostics→Travaux en français237 207→