MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1548248608

Technology Q&A

2004· article· en· W1548248608 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stanley Zarowin

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTypefaceSAFERComputer scienceGraphicsWorld Wide WebComputer graphics (images)Computer securityOperating system
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Work smarter: Put your mouse on the left of the keyboard ... Get Office toolbars to display all functions in drop-down menus ...Make interoffice messaging faster and safer ... Create a hidden footnote in Excel ... Solve the e-mail blind copy danger ... Freeze the position of graphics in Word and Excel ... Find comments in a spreadsheet ... Shortcuts Key to Instructions To help readers follow the instructions in this article, we use two different typefaces: * Boldface type is used to identify the names of icons, agendas and URLs. * Sans serif type indicates the names of files and the names of commands and instructions users should type into the computer. WORK SMARTER: PUT YOUR MOUSE ON THE LEFT OF THE KEYBOARD Q. I'm left-handed and keep my mouse to the left side of my keyboard. My partners keep bugging me to adjust to their right-handed world so that anyone who uses my computer doesn't have to move the mouse. But I tell them that it's they who should make a switch. What do you think? A. Well, I'm biased. I, too, am a lefty and have always kept my mouse on the left side. However, I do it not because I'm left-handed, but because I've experimented and find the left to be a more efficient location. Just look at the keyboard: When the mouse is on the left side, the hand has a shorter distance to travel between the keyboard and the mouse, reducing the risk of carpel tunnel syndrome. But with the mouse on the right side, the hand has to jump over the numeric keypad to get to the mouse. There's research to prove it. According to New Scientist magazine, researchers in Canada asked 27 right-handed volunteers to place their mouse on the left for a month. The volunteers were able to adjust easily and could handle all computing tasks using much smaller movements. They also Found it improved their posture during work because they didn't have to stretch as far. In fact, of the 27 volunteers, 16 decided to stay with the left-handed placement after the experiment ended. Exception: If you're a heavy user of the numeric keypad, you may find it's better to keep the mouse on the right-hand side. GET OFFICE TOOLBARS TO DISPLAY ALL FUNCTIONS IN DROP-DOWN MENUS Q. I recently upgraded to Office XP, and now when I click on the toolbar, only some of the function icons drop down; in order to get them all, I have to click on the double arrows at the bottom of the menu. How can I get the full menu to reappear? A. Before I tell you how to get each dropdown menu to display all its icons, you should be aware of the various toolbar features available. You can make each toolbar category display all of its functions, which looks like the screenshot at right. Or you can format each category to display only those functions you commonly use. Windows monitors which functions you use most and will display an abbreviated menu tailored to your needs, which could look like this: If you opt for an abbreviated menu, you have two further options: Either the full menu will drop down a few seconds after the abbreviated menu opens or it will drop down only if you click on the double arrows at the bottom of the menu. To set any of these defaults, click on Tools, Customize and then on the Options tab, producing this screen: If you want the full menu, place a check in Always show full menus. If you want Windows to display only your commonly used icons, leave it unchecked. But notice that when that box is not checked, you have the option to place a check next to Show full menus after a short delay. Notice, too, you have the option to reset your saved usage data by clicking on Reset menu and toolbar usage data. These menu options work in all Office applications. MAKE INTEROFFICE MESSAGING FASTER AND SAFER Q. Because I'm a faithful reader of your column, I've been designated the technology guru of our small (12 professionals) CPA office and challenged by tray partners to come up with a better way to handle interoffice communications. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,345
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancyMême sujetErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersTravaux en français237 207