MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1549751839

THE CPI MARKET BASKET: A REVIEW OF ECONOMIC AND MARKETING VALIDITY ISSUES

2014· review· en· W1549751839 sur OpenAlex
James Csipak, Cataldo Zuccaro

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of economics and economic education research · 2014
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueWine Industry and Tourism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMarketingPurchasingPopulationAgency (philosophy)BusinessIndex (typography)Agricultural economicsEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION The original impetus for present article came from our School of Business and Economics' Marketing and Entrepreneurship Department (within State University of New York College at Plattsburgh) acceptance, this in summer 2011, to take over Food Market Basket Data collection project. This project had been previously accomplished by a now defunct on-campus federally funded agency. This agency had been in charge of collecting, measuring, and reporting price fluctuations by surveying three (3) conventional supermarkets and one Wal-Mart Supercenter, all located in city of Plattsburgh, a rural setting (population of 22,000 people) in upstate New York, near U.S./Canada border. The survey instrument utilized was composed of forty-one (41) items. In September 2011, a quick perusal of Consumer Price Index (CPI hereafter) at home literature informed us that, within last 20 years, major changes had occurred within at home purchases by U.S. consumers. These changes, as reported by MacDonald (1995), were: 1. Shifts in consumer behavior such as in case of decreased purchases in food-at-home category because of increased purchases at restaurants; 2. Shifts in types of purchases such as purchasing of more fresh fruits and vegetables and less meat products; 3. Shifts in Amount of new products introduced in Supermarkets (for example, number of new products introduced in Supermarkets increased from 5,400 in 1984 to 12,300 in 1992) and 4. Shifts in amount and types of new retail outlets that sell as in case of a growing share of sales occurring outside conventional supermarkets such as at drug stores, at warehouse club stores, at mass merchandisers (or general discount retailers), and at convenience stores as well. Because we were informed that our inherited 41-food item survey instrument dated back to 1978, we suspected that these issues and shifts had not been accounted for. Our team agreed that an assessment of our survey instrument's validity was in order. Our initial quick perusal of CPI literature had equally revealed that there were a number of very important validity issues as to how Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS hereafter) computed CPI that remained unresolved to this day. We decided that we would conduct an exhaustive literature review of both CPI at home category as well as CPI's other goods and services since CPI validity issues would concern all products surveyed by BLS, federal government agency responsible for computing and publishing CPI on a monthly basis. As we are marketing scholars and had neither previous knowledge nor experience with CPI, we believed this effort would help us, first, to best understand benchmark of price fluctuation indexes in U.S. and, second, help us make improvements to our survey instrument. WHY THE CPI MATTERS As stated by Schultze and Mackie (2002) the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is one of most widely used statistics in United States. As a measure of inflation it is a key economic indicator. It serves as a guide for Federal Reserve Board's monetary policy and is an essential tool in calculating changes in nation's output and living standards. It is used to determine annual cost-of-living allowances for social security retirees and other recipients of federal payments, to index federal income tax system for inflation, and as yardstick for U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed bonds. Invariably, as suggested by Boskin et Al. (1998) CPI impacts U.S. national budget and national debt as well. A DESCRIPTION OF THE CPI Essentially, CPI is a measure of average change in prices paid by urban consumers for a fixed market basket of goods and services including food (MacDonald, 1995). According to Wahl (1982) CPI is simply a fixed-weight index for measuring changes in consumer prices between a base period and a subsequent period, weights being established by typical expenditures of all consumers in base period. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,016
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,542
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,816

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0160,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,120
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle