MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1551001030

A Study on the Satisfaction Rate of Foreign Tourists in Iran

2012· article· en· W1551001030 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
J Hezarjaribi, Mohammad Mahdi Najafi

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTourismThe artsMarketingBusinessTourism geographyPersianDistribution (mathematics)EconomyEconomic geographyPolitical scienceEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Extended abstract1-Introduction Tourism and journey industry are one of the most varied industries in the world. Tourism as a social-cultural phenomenon is considered as the widest form of human transportation. Increasing growth of 20th century has made many pundits to call it as tourism century. This industry has many effects on economic, social and cultural areas such as foreign exchanges, incomes, engagement, prices; dispense of incomes, migration, distribution the jobs, customs and arts. Considering the significance of tourism, the main goal of this essay is the satisfaction of foreign tourism in to the Iranian hosts in the extension of tourism industry. In this research the basic main is to persuade the tourism. 2- Methodology In order to achieve this aim, we have two attributive ways (based on a historical study) and ground study. Statistic society of this research includes of foreign tourism from five continents of the world that with the economic, social, cultural and sport goals travel to the Iran.385 tourism was been chosen as a best individual for evaluation from satisfactory from 6 introduce, resident, the general behavior, clean the street from anything, percept driver license, respect to the others and precept in the clean the street from individuals. 3– Discussion The results of the study showed that level of tourist satisfaction and the willingness of tourists to travel have high status. So the operators of public participation in protecting the global environment, cultural heritage and nature as an effective agent can help to develop the country's tourism industry. Achieving sustainable development in the countries involved in planning and implementing projects is essential. In this respect, we can organize tourism activities. In addition, many of the problems of agriculture and industry, social, economic and eliminates the problem of youth employment. Development of tourism in Iran, the government has an important role in the overall policy of the Government in this regard would be helpful. To investigate possible solutions should be considered from different perspectives of the tourism industry Charhandyshy for each of them and the obstacles in the way.4– Conclusion As a results 86% from tourism were very satisfy to the Iranian person and 95% like to travel to the Iran again. And the correlation coefficient between two variety the sense of satisfactory and the tendency to the travel to the Iran for second time is the considerable correlation r=582% and observe meaningful surface (p=0.000).Because this coefficient is positive and show the right relation between two variety, to the attention the measure of appointment coefficient (R2=0.34) about 0.34% from variety like to travel to the Iran again. So, when ascendant the measure of the sense of satisfaction of tourism than to the Iranian people increased the tendency to the travel to Iran for second time.Key words: tourism, tourist, satisfactory, tourism development ReferencesBrown D. (2003), Rural Tourism: An Annotated Bibliography ,Regional Economist , WashingtonBen, Daniel & Schwier M, (2003) “Social capital in virtual learning communities and distributed communities of practice”, Canadian journal of learning and technology. vol 29. Fischer, claude S. (2001).“Bowling alone: What’s the score?”, Department of Sociology. August.fukuyama, f. ( 2001), maintain appropriate and social capital, Golem Abass, tavassoli, jamah Iranian, Tehran.Hezarjaribi, j. & R. Safari Shali. (2010), an Investigation of Effective Factors on civilain’s social trust amanag iranian pepole,majalah jamashanasi karbordi (applied socialogy) vol 36,No.4, esfahan.Kamali, A. (2004) comparative study of social trust in cultural policies (P.H.D), Supervisor taghi Azaad Aarmaki, Tehran university, department sociology.Colman, J. (1999) foundations of social theory, Manouchehr Saboury, ney publications, first edition, Tehran.Giddens, A. (1995) sociology, Manouchehr sabouri,Tehran, ney publications, Tehran .Hykuy salehy, M, (2006) relationship between social capital network and mutual trust between the person and gender, Supervisor, Sosan Bastani, Alzahra university, department of sociology.Share pour M. (2002 ) Erosion of capital social and consequences . Namah anjoman Jamahshanaci,Vol 3. Giddens, A. ( 2000) , Modernity and Self-Identity, Nasser moafagheyan .tehran. ney publications, Tehran . Giddens, A. (1999) The Consequences of Modernity, mohsen salassy. center publications ,Tehran. Rezvani, A. A. (2003), world tourism journal of tourism and civil aviation in the ninth month of number51,june and july (2003) Versely, P. (1995), modern sociology , pouyan hasan , chappakhsh publications. first edition Eshvandy, M. (2000). position of tourism in Iran, Supervisor Hamid Ansari, Tehran university, department sociology.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,450
Tête enseignante GPT0,605
Écart entre enseignants0,156 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Même sujetDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research→Travaux en français237 207→