Development of an Educational Sabbatical Program for Pharmacists
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION The University Health Network (UHN) is an acute care teaching hospital providing clinical services at 3 sites in Toronto, Ontario. It serves a large and diverse community that includes local, regional, and provincial populations, as well as out-of-province and out-of-country clients. The patient care continuum covers the full spectrum from primary care to highly specialized tertiary care services. Pharmacists work within 1 of 5 clinical teams aligned with priority programs under the direction of clinical leaders. The pharmacists (mean number per team = 13) are responsible for decentralized distribution and clinical services in the team’s assigned area: cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and cardiovascular intensive care; transplant, medical/surgical intensive care, general surgery, and psychiatry; general medicine, nephrology, hemodialysis, urology, respirology, and surgery; general medicine, neurology, rheumatology, othopedics, medical/surgical intensive care; and oncology. When a pharmacist is hired, he or she is assigned to one of these teams according to where a position is available; if possible, pharmacists are assigned to positions that correspond with their practice interests. Details about the team and the therapeutic area are specified in job postings, which facilitates recruitment of pharmacists with appropriate interests. Pharmacists work only within their own team area; thus, over time, they develop highly specialized practices and clinical skills. Although this arrangement means that pharmacists are able to consistently offer comprehensive, high-level clinical services, it also limits their exposure to areas of practice outside their team’s activities. The Pharmacy Department employs approximately 100 pharmacists, ranging from new graduates to long-term employees with more than 25 years of experience, many of whom have completed or are in the midst of postgraduate education, including studies toward doctorate of pharmacy (PharmD), master of business administration, and master’s degrees in bioethics, clinical epidemiology, and health administration. This large and varied group offers the department strength through diversity and challenges the department to develop retention strategies that will stimulate and support all staff members. A significant change to human resource management strategies in recent years is the increasing emphasis on long-term staff retention.1,2 Staff satisfaction and retention have been positively linked to supportive work environments that foster professional development, mentorship, and succession planning.2,3 This shift has been further supported by the Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation, which has identified the need for hospitals to “provide ongoing training to cope with changing roles, competency demands and working relationships”.4 At UHN, although staff have enjoyed the stability of working within specific clinical areas, it was recognized that many individuals with specialized practices also had an interest in expanding their horizons. In the past, a clinical pharmacist with an interest in another therapeutic program had to either wait until a position became available within the new area or leave the organization to pursue a job within the chosen field of interest. UHN human resource data showed that the period of greatest vulnerability for loss of pharmacists occurred after staff had been at the institution for 3 to 5 years. Exit interviews also indicated that the reason for moving to another organization was often to pursue new areas of clinical practice or leadership positions. In an employee satisfaction survey conducted in the Pharmacy Department in 2002 (n = 125), 50% of respondents rated recognition and compensation as “good” to “excellent”, and 41% of respondents rated organizational commitment as “good” to “excellent”. Therefore, departmental leadership was interested in supporting staff growth and career development while minimizing staff loss. As an academic health science centre, UHN has developed experiential learning programs for new pharmacists (e.g., undergraduate exposures, postgraduate residencies, doctorate of pharmacy rotations). It was felt that this expertise could be used to develop an innovative experiential program to address the continuing education needs of staff pharmacists and to potentially act as a retention incentive. Therefore, the Educational Sabbatical Program (ESP) was launched in 2004. Several clinical training programs for staff pharmacists, primarily in the United States, have previously been described.5-9 In general, these programs are 3 to 18 months in duration and incorporate a mix of lectures, didactic course work (often done on the pharmacist’s own time), and some experiential learning, with or without formalized testing or certification of the pharmacist upon completion of the program. One program was formulated as an additional position that was filled on a 6-week rotating basis by staff pharmacists, who received clinical training under supervising clinical pharmacists.8 The authors found that, on average, completion of at least 2 or 3 rotations was necessary for distribution pharmacists to develop and maintain desired drug information and clinical skills. In the late 1970s, a 2-week mini-residency in drug information for pharmacists was developed by the University of Washington Drug Information Service and the University of Washington School of Pharmacy’s Division of Continuing Education.10 Overall, these programs were successful in training distribution pharmacists with little to no previous clinical experience to practise as clinical pharmacists. To the authors’ knowledge, no such exposure or training program has been described for staff pharmacists with high-level clinical skills who wish to gain experience in a different practice area.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».