MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1551669382

Recognizing Aboriginal Title: The Mabo Case and Indigenous Resistance to English-Settler Colonialism

2006· article· en· W1551669382 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAustralian aboriginal studies/Australian Aboriginal studies · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLaw in Society and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousPoliticsColonialismLawBody politicPublishingObjectivity (philosophy)SociologyResistance (ecology)Indigenous rightsNoticeMedia studiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyEpistemology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recognizing Aboriginal title: the Mabo case and Indigenous resistance to English-settler colonialism Peter H Russell University of Toronto Press Inc., 2005, xii+470pp including notes, bibliography and index, ISBN 0802038638 Upon first hearing Peter Russell comment on his latest publication during a Flinders University 'Indigenous Australians and the Law' lecture, I was impressed with the way he passionately articulated his views regarding the nature of Australian native title and Indigenous affairs, yet also intrigued about the approach an Anglo-Canadian scholar of political science would adopt towards analysing the relations Indigenous peoples have with the Australian state. Why did he, of all academics familiar with the Mabo case and its implications, choose to focus his latest work on the topic, and what could he potentially offer that other academics could, or simply would, not? I was pleased to discover that Peter Russell's unique position bestowed numerous benefits. First, since he is located outside the Australian body politic, his analysis has the advantage of objectivity. At the same time, this prompted him to incorporate a comparative and international perspective, which adds an important dimension to the text. After all, Australian developments culminating in the Mabo case were largely influenced by those occurring elsewhere. Moreover, Russell's political science, rather than purely legal, orientation led him to openly examine the interplay between law and politics. Somewhat refreshingly, he had no qualms about satirically referring to the 'legal magic' often prevalent in the settlers' legal system, the so-called legal 'great god of certainty' (p.322) at play, or the ability of the settlers' court to act as the 'legendary trickster' (p.343). Lastly, as 'a person whose ancestral ties are with the colonizing English-speaking people' (p.381), Russell's work is arguably an important contribution to the global process of Indigenous-Settler reconciliation, which he identifies not only as ongoing, but also as an objective that must be mutually aspired towards, and cooperatively obtained. Russell comprehensively covers the development of Indigenous-Settler relations in Australia, from the time of settlement in 1788 right up until the millennium and beyond. This might sound like a rather dry and heavy mix; however, Russell stylishly interweaves the biographical side of the text with the broader theoretical context in which it is embedded. As the book's centrepiece stands Eddie Koiki Mabo (p.312): a Merian man of the Pladarim clan, pearler, long-time exile, cane-cutter, dock-worker, loving husband, father and grandfather, school founder, community activist, university groundsman, researcher and lecturer, champion of Indigenous culture, and a courageous, indefatigable but mortal litigator. Indeed, one could not easily appreciate what led Eddie Mabo down this winding pathway, without Russell's exploration of the ideology and implications of imperialism (in Part 1), or his analysis of the foundations of Australian colonialism (in Part 2)--the very remnants of which Mabo sought to overcome. Similarly, the human element to the text helps the reader grasp and digest the true nature of imperialism and colonialism and the impact they had, and still have, upon Indigenous peoples. In this way, the macro and micro aspects of the text tend to reinforce one another and enrich the text as a whole. Contrary to what one might expect, the dual character of the book does not compromise its overall coherency. Russell has strategically interspersed the more biographical sections of the text among the theoretical and has succeeded in producing a very integrated whole. After tracing Mabo's upbringing and political awakenings, Russell moves on to discuss the ideology and legal legitimisation of Western imperialism. His comparative analysis of the different English-settler colonial laws and policies follows further biographical detail about Mabo and the local legal and political climate he confronted as a young man. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,429
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,381
Écart entre enseignants0,348 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle