Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Social justice, political violence and the motivations behind war were just some of the issues discussed at The University of Notre Dame Australia’s recent Conversations on Tap series at its Fremantle Campus. Peace and Social Justice Lecturer, Associate Professor Richard Matthews, of King’s University College, Western Ontario, was invited to examine the underlying justifications for political violence and to consider if there was a justifiable difference between defensive and pre-emptive action taken by States when held up to closer scrutiny. Discovering an appreciation of the importance of social justice issues following international reactions to the events of September 11, 2001, Associate Professor Matthew said various outrages at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, Diego Garcia, Bagram AFB and many other sites convinced him of the need to learn and understand ongoing political violence. “I started with a project on torture, but I have gradually been led to appreciate the significance of economic and colonial factors in ongoing violence,” he said. “There are many causes of violence, including past historical grievances and individual and cultural trauma, but in my view, economic and geopolitical interests are the main causes.” In examining whether political violence was ever justifiable, Associate Professor Matthews said it was important to explore the motivations behind the action to gain a better understanding. “Wars are fought to secure State interests, and non-State interests, increasingly, whatever moral mask gets attached to a given situation,” he said. “I don’t believe Iraq and Afghanistan are being fought for the sake of women and human rights. They are really about transforming societies in a way that their architects believe are beneficial to their interests.” In answering questions regarding any possible exceptions to the rule, Associate Professor Matthews said he was highly dubious as to whether political violence was ever justified. “I do not have a developed position as to whether it might be justifiable in some circumstances,” he said. “In saying that, we construct a wide range of myths to justify our past participation in violence, as well as to ensure our continued support for, and participation in, contemporary and future violence.” Associate Professor Matthews said his anti-war stance informed his belief that all ongoing conflicts, particularly those occurring since 2001, were unjustified. Media Contact: Andrea Barnard (+61) 8 9433 0610, Mob (+61) 0408 959 138
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,179 | 0,033 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».