MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1553453531

Turbo Chicks: Talking Young Feminisms

2001· article· en· W1553453531 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michele Byers, Allyson Mitchell, Lara Karaian, Lisa Bryn Rundle

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender, Feminism, and Media
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeminismSkepticismSociologyGender studiesMainstreamFeminist philosophyMedia studiesLawPhilosophyEpistemologyPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Allyson Mitchell, Lisa Bryn Rundle and Lara Karaian, eds.Toronto: Sumach Press, 2001; 364 pp.Reviewed by Michele ByersDepartment of Sociology and CriminologySaint Mary's UniversityHalifax, Nova ScotiaAs a feminist scholar of popular culture, of just about the same age as the editors of this book, I feel I am very much on home territory. I have also followed, with much interest and for quite a few years, the discussions about generation and its relationship(s) to feminism. I too have raised a skeptical eyebrow as young women have been labelled (in editor Lara Karaian's words) apathetic and apolitical (p. 14). Allyson Mitchell, another of the editors, suggests that [T]he idea of young women not being feminist is a self-fulfilling prophecy (p. 15). But this is only true in the sense that saying it will make it in the minds of those who are listening. It is clear from this anthology that young women ARE being feminist. They are being feminist even if the mainstream isn't paying attention to them. They are being feminist despite the negative labels that seem to stick to them like Yonge Street debris to the gum on your shoe. They are being feminist in all kinds of ways, some of which fall in line with earlier versions of feminism and some of which radically break from these older traditions. They are being feminist by constantly adding to and expanding what this term means. And that, I think, is at the heart of Turbo Chicks.An interesting paradox in the idea that young women reject feminism and refuse to participate in political activism is the number of books that seem aimed at exactly the kinds of girls and young women that we are continually told do not exist. I started with my own library, where I found quite a few anthologies relating to youth and feminism. But since I may not represent the average reader, I decided to probe a bit further into the mainstream via Amazon.com. On that site, I discovered an extensive array of books devoted to this subject that had been written over the past seven years. Some of these, like Turbo Chicks, are explicitly political. For example Barbara Findlen's Listen Up: Voices from the Next Feminist Generation (1995) (so popular a new edition was released in 2001), Leslie Heywood and Jennifer Drake's Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism (1997), Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards' Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism and the Future (2000), and Danya Ruttenberg's Yentl's Revenge (2001). Others, like Marcelle Karp and Debbie Stoller's BUST Guide to the New Girl Order (1999) and Tristan Taormino and Karen Green's Girl's Guide to Taking Over the World: Writings from the Girl Zine Revolution (1997), take a more journalistic approach. Still others, like Cameron Tuttle's Bad Girl's series, are about fun AND emancipation. An interest in feminism can also be linked to magazines aimed at young women, like Bitch, BUST and Hue. There is definitely a theme here, and a scene. These books and magazines are available easily and everywhere; they do not seem to be rarities. As I meandered through the Amazon site, I found more and more books written for and by young feminists. I also found book lists (like the lists of feminist influences provided by the editors of this volume, see below) compiled by girls and young women, many of whom had self-identified as feminist. It seems young and feminist aren't words that are so estranged from one another after all.Maybe it is not that young women aren't feminist, maybe it is just that the writers getting the most press are those who espouse a view more in line with the Right wing discourses that carry so much weight today. These authors know and are perhaps better positioned to reap the benefits of a media-saturated society. And let's face it, if you get in front of the camera (or microphone) and speak in the voice of backlash about date rape and the desire for moral clarity you are going to attract a lot of attention (Roiphe, 1993, 1997). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,782
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,104
Tête enseignante GPT0,423
Écart entre enseignants0,319 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations29
Publié2001
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetGender, Feminism, and MediaTravaux en français237 207