MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1553706385

Development of the interRAI Brief Mental Health Screener to Enhance the Ability of Police Officers to Identify Persons with Serious Mental Disorder

2013· dissertation· en· W1553706385 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronald E. Hoffman

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2013
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMental healthCriminalizationCriminal justicePsychologyDysfunctional familyPsychological interventionPsychiatryNursingApplied psychologyMedicineCriminology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Police officers are often the first to respond when persons experience a mental health crisis in the community. They must de-escalate volatile situations involving persons with serious mental disorder (PSMD) and bring the person to the attention of either the criminal justice or mental health care system. It is argued that issues such as repeated police contact, excessive emergency department (ED) wait times, and the criminalization of the mentally ill are evidence that the current system lacks the ability to meet the needs of PSMD. Critics have argued the source of the problem is inadequate police training, and insufficient and poorly organized community mental health services. Others claim that the underlying issue is that the current system for responding to PSMD is dysfunctional. The model is based on the concept that the best way to meet the needs of PSMD is through the integration of systems and services which to date, has remained an impossible goal. Given the current system will not be replaced anytime soon, efforts should be directed toward developing innovative ways to make it easier for the systems to work more effectively together.
\nObjectives: The major objective of this dissertation was to develop and pilot a new mental health screening form, the interRAI Brief Mental Health Screener (BMHS)* to enhance the ability of police officers to identify PSMD, and to support their decision-making. A second objective was to develop a model that best predicts which persons are most likely to be taken to hospital by police officers and which persons most likely to be admitted. A final objective was to analyze the impact that interacting with PSMD has on police resources in terms of the amount of time police officers spend on mental health related calls for service.
\nMethodology: Logistic regression analysis was used to identify 14 predictors of serious mental health disorders from 41,019 cases obtained from the main Resident Assessment Instrument for 
\nMental Health (RAI-MH) database. The RAI-MH is a comprehensive mental health assessment system that is currently used for all persons admitted into a psychiatric hospital in Ontario. Additional clinical, demographic and contextual items were added after consultation with an advisory committee composed of representatives from hospitals and police services resulting in a pilot version of the interRAI BMHS. The County of Wellington and the city of Guelph were selected as the setting for the pilot that included 4 general hospitals, 1 psychiatric facility and the participation of the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) and the Guelph Police Service. After training police officers to use the new form, the interRAI BMHS was pilot tested over a seven month period commencing May 2011. Hospital records were also accessed to determine patient disposition. Logistic regression was used to develop an algorithm to identify the persons with the highest probability of being taken to hospital by police officers, and those persons who were most likely to be admitted. 
\nResults: Police officers from the two jurisdictions in Ontario completed a total of 235 interRAI BMHS forms. Chi square analysis revealed the most common reasons why police officers take persons to hospital included the person considering performing a self-injurious act in the past 30 days, and family, and others were concerned the person was at risk for self-injury. Intoxication by drugs or alcohol and having symptoms of psychosis were not significant reasons for police officers to take a person to hospital. The variables most associated with being admitted after being taken to hospital, included indicators of disordered, such as lack of insight into their mental health problems, abnormal thought process, delusions and hallucinations. Overall, although the terminology differed, the same patterns emerged in the pilot study that previous research reported. Police officers tend to focus on dangerousness and public safety, while clinicians are concerned with indicators of disordered thought. Logistic regression analysis 
\nrevealed that the 14 variable algorithm used to construct the interRAI BMHS was a good predictor of who was most likely to be taken to hospital by police officers, and who was most likely to be admitted. Another important finding was that the reasons why police officers take persons to hospital were not the same as the reasons why persons are subsequently admitted. This suggests the criminal justice, health and mental health systems are not synchronized. The research also revealed that police officers spend a mean time of over three hours overall devoted to calls for service involving PSMD, and a mean time of just over three hours waiting in the ED. 
\nConclusion: The interRAI BMHS provides useful information for both police officers and ED staff regarding the variables significantly associated with serious mental disorder. It will help support police officer and ED decision-making, and it will contribute to enhancing the training provided to police officers and mental health service providers. Additional research and larger sample sizes will help to further refine the instrument. The interRAI BMHS is based on health system data and written in the language of the health system. As such, it has the potential to both enhance the ability of police officers and other mental health service providers to identify indicators of serious mental disorder, and to help synchronize the criminal justice and mental health care systems.
\n*interRAI stands for the international resident assessment instrument, in international collaborative to improve the quality of life of vulverable persons through a seamless comprehensive assessment system.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,214
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingTravaux en français237 207