MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1554604006 · doi:10.1353/sex.2005.0034

Courtly Love in Medieval Manuscripts (review)

2004· article· en· W1554604006 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jarbel Rodríguez

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the History of Sexuality · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval Literature and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRomanceMiddle AgesContext (archaeology)Medieval literatureLiteraturePhilosophy of loveArgument (complex analysis)Old FrenchMiddle EnglishClassicsArtHistoryAncient history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Courtly Love in Medieval Manuscripts Jarbel Rodriguez Courtly Love in Medieval Manuscripts. By Pamela Porter. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003. Pp. 64. $19.95 (paper). Pamela Porter's Courtly Love in Medieval Manuscripts is a beautifully illustrated introduction to courtly love in the high and later Middle Ages. This very light volume is a true visual delight that aims to place "the literary convention in context, distinguishing it from the realities of romantic love in the Middle Ages and highlighting its role in shaping the manners and entertainments of courtly society" (8). The greatest strength of the book is its superb illustrations, excellently reproduced and drawn from over forty different manuscripts from the British Library, where Porter is a former curator. The text, on the other hand, has its limitations, providing more of a running commentary on the images than creating a stand-alone argument. Using the Victorian fascination with things medieval as a starting point, Porter quickly jumps to a chapter on "Romantic Love in the Middle Ages." As with all the writing in the book, one wishes that Porter would develop some of her points more fully and give them more nuance, yet that is not her goal. Instead, she manages to provide a rather concise and highly readable introduction to the topic of realistic romantic love in medieval Europe. This chapter is placed in contrast to the one that follows, "Courtly Love: The Other Woman," which focuses on the literary genre and its collective champions—troubadours and minnesingers—as well as the individual works that made it so popular. Porter does a good job here of highlighting the importance of the "lady" to the ideal of courtly love. The third and final chapter shifts the focus to the knights and the chivalric culture upon which Porter claims courtly love had such an impact. Much of this chapter is a summary of the more famous Arthurian romances and their importance in bridging the gap between the traditional chansons de geste and the newer [End Page 539] courtly love ideals. The chapter culminates with a brief exploration of Chrétien de Troyes's Le Chevalier de la Charette and the love affair between Lancelot and Queen Guinevere. As throughout the rest of the book, the attending images in this section are well chosen, providing easy transitions between text and image that are some of the real joys of this book. Porter's work should have a wide audience. Although aimed primarily as an introduction to the topic, more advanced readers will also benefit from this little volume. I can imagine using it in the classroom to supplement some of the very works she discusses, such as Capellanus's The Art of Courtly Love and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, allowing students to experience not just the words but also the images that were such an integral part of the original manuscripts. Porter's work, however, is not without faults. The brevity of the text, although intentional, tends to present a society that is rather static. Likewise, her loose use of terms like "medieval" and "Middle Ages" is a bit distracting. To many medievalists the terms represent the period that begins with the fall of the Roman Empire (476) and ends with the Renaissance. Porter's word choice suggests that courtly love was evident throughout this thousand-year period, when this was certainly not the case. The book would have also benefited from a lengthier "Further Reading" section. Considering its target audience of students and nonmedievalists, a bibliography with more than the seven items Porter lists would have been a nice addition. Finally, a few words describing what we might call the darker side of courtly love would have given the book more balance. Although women in courtly love literature were idealized, we must also remember that they became the object that the gallant knight sought to gain. Idealized or not, the women were often tokens of conquest in the martial world of their male lovers. Moreover, these idealized women were always noble. Peasant and lower-class women fared rather differently. The same writer who could tell his readers to "be obedient in all things to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,630
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the History of SexualityMême sujetMedieval Literature and HistoryTravaux en français237 207