Detrimental effects of prolonged warm renal ischaemia‐reperfusion injury are abrogated by supplemental hydrogen sulphide: an analysis using real‐time intravital microscopy and polymerase chain reaction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Hydrogen sulphide (H(2) S) has recently been classified as a member of the gasotransmitter family. Its physiological and pathophysiological effects are rapidly expanding with numerous studies highlighting the protective effects of H(2) S on ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in various organ systems, e.g. heart, liver, CNS and lungs. The mechanisms behind its protective effects reside in its vasodilatory, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant characteristics. These specific mechanistic profiles appear to be different across different tissues and models of IRI. We recently showed that supplementation of preservation solutions with H(2) S during periods of prolonged cold renal storage and subsequent renal transplantation leads to a massive and significant survival, functional and tissue protective advantage compared with storage in standard preservation solution alone. However, there have only been a few studies that have evaluated the effects of H(2) S against warm renal IRI; although these studies have focused primarily upon shorter periods of warm renal pedicle clamping, they have shown a clear survival benefit to H(2) S supplementation. The present study adds to the existing literature by evaluating the effects of H(2) S in a model of warm IRI with clinically relevant, prolonged warm ischaemia-reperfusion times (1 h ischaemia, 2 h reperfusion). We show an unprecedented view into real-time renal and hepatic perfusion with intravital microscopy throughout the reperfusion period. We show, for the first time, that supplemental H(2) S has multiple protective functions against the warm IRI-induced tissue damage, which may be clinically applicable to both donation after cardiac death models of renal transplantation, as well as to uro-oncological practices requiring surgical clamping of the renal pedicle, e.g. during a partial nephrectomy. OBJECTIVE: • To determine the protective role of supplemental hydrogen sulphide (H(2) S) in prolonged warm renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) using real-time intravital microscopy (IVM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: • Uninephrectomised Lewis rats underwent 1 h of warm ischaemia and 2 h of reperfusion during intraperitoneal treatment with phosphate buffer saline (IRI, n = 10) or 150 µmol/L NaHS (IRI+H(2) S, n = 12) and were compared with sham-operated rats (n = 9). • Blood was collected for measurement of serum creatinine (Cr), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). • IVM was performed to assess renal and hepatic microcirculation. • Kidneys were sectioned for histology and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for markers of inflammation. RESULTS: • The mean (sd) Cr concentration raised to 72.8(2.5) µmol/L after IRI from 11.0 (0.7) µmol/L (sham) but was partially inhibited with H(2) S to 62.8 (0.9) µmol/L (P < 0.05). • H(2) S supplementation during IRI increased renal capillary perfusion on IVM, and improved acute tubular necrosis and apoptotic scores on histology (P < 0.05). • Supplemental H(2) S decreased expression of the pro-inflammatory markers toll-like receptor 4, tumour necrosis factor α, interleukin 8, C-C chemokine receptor type 5, interferon γ and interleukin 2 (P < 0.05). • Distant organ (liver) dysfunction after renal IRI was limited with H(2) S supplementation: blunting of the ALT and AST surge, decreased hepatic sinusoidal vasodilation, and decreased leukocyte infiltration in post-sinusoidal venules (P < 0.05). • H(2) S supplementation directly inhibited interleukin 8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis in vitro (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: • These findings are the first to show the real-time protective role of supplemental H(2) S in prolonged periods of warm renal IRI, perhaps acting by decreasing leukocyte migration and limiting inflammatory responses. • The protective effects of H(2) S suggest potential clinical applications in both donors after cardiac death models of renal transplantation and oncological practices requiring vascular clamping.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».