<b>David Glimp</b>, <i>Increase and Multiply: Governing Cultural Reproduction in Early Modern England</i>, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Foucault has been a presence in studies of the English literary Renaissance at least since his visit to Berkeley in the early 1980s, often seen as the big bang moment of New Historicism, a mode of approach developed by the Shakespeare scholar Stephen Greenblatt but which has influenced the study of all periods and genres of literary production.New Historicism was and is many things; in Greenblatt's hands, it is a vigorous genre of writing that defies in many ways the artificial disciplinary divisions between the critical and creative.Commencing with the description of an early modern anecdote, the genre reads small cultural moments to tell big stories about big power.Despite the fact that Foucault was not much for big bang narratives, nor for the notion that monolithic power structures such as the state or commerce determine absolutely the governed lives of humans, the narrative suggests that New Historicism consistently finds cultural subversion to be "contained" by the order it would challenge by virtue of its relation to Foucault.On the other hand, New Historicism and other literary approaches to history since the 1970s have usefully questioned, after Foucault, the categorical difference between literary and historical documents.In their claims for "the historicity of [literary] texts and the textuality of history" these new historicisms have changed in irrevocable and positive ways our approaches to the study of English literature.Shakespeare is now a dense historical archive, while letters, conduct manuals, navigational treatises and tracts on health are mined for their rhetorical strategies and narrative structures.The discourses revealed in such works are examined in moments of creative tension as they provide differing representations of and commentary on living and knowing in the early modern period.The problem remains that for some historians and literary scholars, (many of whom appear not to have read Foucault), Foucault is New Historicism and especially its weaknesses; in this regard, Foucault as "author function" can evoke hostility in the interlocutors of those who cite him.Historians complain that not only were Foucault's methods faulty, but that the arguments he made about crime and punishment, sexuality and health
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle