Priority Information Needs for Mourning and White-winged Doves
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This Strategy contains recommendations for obtaining priority information needed to reduce the uncertainties underlying management decisions for two of the most important game birds in North America, mourning and white-winged doves. This strategy is intended to increase the financial support for management over the next five to 10 years with thoughtful and deliberate planning built on basic scientific principles. The Task Force determined that convening a workshop of national dove experts to develop the strategy would be the most efficient and effective process. By invitation of the Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Working Group chairman, experts from state and federal agencies, flyways and universities were invited to the workshop. Experts from Canada and Mexico were also invited, but were unable to attend. The workshop was held February 12-14, 2008, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Region 6 Office in Denver, Colorado. By almost every measure, mourning and white-winged doves are critically important game birds in North America. The mourning dove is the most harvested migratory game bird species in the U.S. — nearly 20.7 million mourning doves were harvested by nearly 1.1 million hunters each year in 2005 and 2006. In addition, mourning doves (and white-winged doves in the Southwest) are valued by the public in rural, suburban, and urban locales because they occur widely, nest readily around yards and farmsteads, and are frequent visitors to bird feeders (Schwertner et al., 2002). The economic impact of dove hunting is considerable. The 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation estimated that average annual expenditures for migratory bird hunters are $588 each. Four priority information needs for mourning and white-winged doves have been determined: 1) A national banding program for doves. 2) A national dove parts collection survey. 3) Independent measures of abundance and/or trends for doves. 4) A database of predictors of dove vital rates. Workshop participants identified four overarching guidelines that should be considered in further development of each of the priority information needs: 1) Consider the involvement of Canada and Mexico. 2) Account for differences in urban and rural doves. 3) Gather human dimensions information. 4) Consider the effects of climate or system change and its impacts on dove vital rates. Priority information needs outlined in this Strategy will increase management population performance significantly by: •Reducing uncertainty surrounding vital rates and management decisions; • Enabling management actions to be more responsive to changes in vital rates; and • Providing information to enable a more formal decision-making process. Ultimately, these priorities help build on the foundation of current efforts in a way that ensures the long-term conservation and informed harvest management of these critically important birds in the face of a changing environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle