MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1558717117

Reflexive Pedagogy and the Sociological Imagination

2009· article· en· W1558717117 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Stalker, Jason Pridmore

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman architecture · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReflexivitySociologySociological imaginationWrightEpistemologySociological theoryPedagogyBiographySocial scienceComputer sciencePhilosophyLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Some fifty years after the publication of The Sociological Imagination by C. Wright Mills, students of sociology often have difficulty grasping the interplay of man (sic.) and society, of biography and history, of self and world (Mills 1959:4). In this paper we suggest that in part this is due to our inability to publicly model our own sociological imagination given the compartmentalized demands that are all too often placed upon us. Michael Burawoy suggests that our professional lives as academics are divided into four separated compartments: public, policy, critical, and professional (2005). The tendency is for these areas to remain distinctive, with little to no interchange between them. In what follows, we begin to demonstrate how the theoretical and methodological understandings derived from our 'critical' lives--that of our research work--can be incorporated into our 'professional' lives as instructors, and how the practice of what we call 'reflexive pedagogy' can students up to fully grasp and cultivate the sociological imagination. Our own research work has exhibited the importance of 'reflexivity' for our qualitative methodological practices and we have chosen to integrate this into our own pedagogical practice in order to introduce students to the sociological imagination. This occurs through the purposeful positioning of ourselves in relation to the materials we choose to instruct, the university locations of our instruction, and, most importantly, as a purposeful process of educating our students. It is this dual process of self-reflection as instructor and engaging students into self-positioning within their own sociological learning that we describe as reflexive pedagogy. In this article we draw upon some of our experiences teaching Canadian undergraduate students at both Memorial University of Newfoundland and Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, to demonstrate an orientation toward reflexive pedagogy. These are two very different universities with distinctive student bodies and ethos, yet we believe our reflexive relation toward course instruction at these universities drew students into a mode of reflexive learning. The paper describes modes of interrogating qualitative data by Jennifer Mason (2002) as analogous to modes of sociological learning. Tailoring courses to integrate popular culture, questions of social identity, and relevant local concerns into sociology courses, is part of the distinctiveness of what we are referring to as reflexive pedagogy. Though this certainly happens to varying extents in sociology classrooms, we believe the modes of sociological learning outlined in what follows provides for a compelling pedagogical practice, specifically as it draws on an increasing centralization of the notion of the self and emphasizes both individual and collective identity. Though there are a number of alternative views of pedagogy within sociology, we believe that issues of individualization (see Bauman 2000) and the concept of reflexivity (see Beck, Giddens, Lash 1994) provide the tools necessary for a new generation of sociology students to acquire the sociological imagination. This may open up new and previously unsuspected possibilities of living one's life with others with more self-awareness, more comprehension of our surroundings ...[,] and perhaps also with more freedom and control (Bauman and May 2001:10). Reflexivity and Instruction Reflexivity has been a fairly prominent term in sociological literature for the past twenty-five years, seen as the capacity of people to be both subjects and objects to themselves (Weigert and Grecas, 2003:280). It is also a core concept within the sociological theory of Anthony Giddens (1991), who with Ulrick Beck and Scott Lash brought the term its most prominence, specifically in relation to identity and social institutions. There has also been an increased awareness and call to use reflexive methodology when doing qualitative research, particularly with post-structuralist critiques of qualitative methods that made explicit the need for researchers to situate themselves within their data (Brewer, 2005). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,017
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,092

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0170,018
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,088
Communication savante0,0130,011
Science ouverte0,0020,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,425
Écart entre enseignants0,381 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman architectureMême sujetContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeTravaux en français237 207